Utah

10-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.8%Utah

92.2%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -16.5

PROJECTED TOTAL148.4

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -1182

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUtah 66

Projected Total148.4

Projected ScoreCincinnati 82

Team Comparison

UtahMetricCincinnati

43.9MMH Power Index61.5

108.8Offensive Efficiency105.3

115.8Defensive Efficiency97.3

-7.0Net Efficiency8.0

5.1Strength of Schedule5.1

-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

68.3Tempo69.4

52.3%Effective FG%50.6%

16.7%Turnover Rate17.0%

28.8%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

32.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%

-4.8Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–43.9), defensive efficiency (97.3–115.8), net efficiency (8.0–-7.0), recent form (14.4–-16.3).

Utah COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.8–105.3), shooting efficiency (52.3–50.6), ball security (16.7–17.0).

Final

Utah

66—73

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 7 • 65.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UtahTEAM STATCincinnati

23-62FG27-60

37.0%FG%45.0%

5-183PT9-23

28.0%3PT%39.0%

15-16FT10-18

94.0%FT%56.0%

37Rebounds40

11Offensive Rebounds11

10Assists15

8Turnovers7

3Steals2

2Blocks8

15Fouls14

Player Box Score

Utah

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Terrence Brown	G	34	7-19	0-0	8-9	2	6	2	0	22
Keanu Dawes	F	33	5-11	2-5	3-3	12	1	0	0	15
Seydou Traore	F	35	5-11	2-5	0-0	5	0	1	1	12
Don McHenry	G	32	2-10	0-5	4-4	1	1	0	0	8
Lucas Langarita	G	10	2-4	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
James Okonkwo	F	25	1-3	0-0	0-0	7	0	0	0	2
Kendyl Sanders	F	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Josh Hayes	F	13	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	1	0
Obomate Abbey	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Celestine	G	27	6-9	5-8	2-2	3	1	0	0	19
Moustapha Thiam	C	33	5-13	1-3	3-6	10	1	0	2	14
Baba Miller	F	37	5-9	0-1	1-4	14	6	0	1	11
Keyshuan Tillery	G	16	3-7	2-3	0-0	0	2	1	0	8
Jizzle James	G	27	3-9	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	1	6
Day Day Thomas	G	32	1-7	0-4	3-4	0	1	0	1	5
Sencire Harris	G	11	2-2	0-0	1-2	3	1	1	0	5
Shon Abaev	G	11	1-2	1-2	0-0	6	0	0	2	3
Tyler McKinley	F	5	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	2
Halvine Dzellat	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6

100.6Offensive Efficiency111.3

111.3Defensive Efficiency100.6

-10.7Net Efficiency10.7

41.1%Effective FG%52.5%

47.4%True Shooting %53.2%

12.0%Turnover Rate10.8%

25.8%Free Throw Rate30.0%

29.0%3-Point Rate38.3%

1.25Assist / Turnover2.14

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.