Wake Forest

18-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

31.7%Wake Forest

68.3%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -6.6

PROJECTED TOTAL146.9

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -215

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWake Forest 70

Projected Total146.9

Projected ScoreClemson 77

Team Comparison

Wake ForestMetricClemson

57.6MMH Power Index59.9

112.4Offensive Efficiency112.6

109.7Defensive Efficiency101.4

2.7Net Efficiency11.2

7.2Strength of Schedule4.6

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

70.2Tempo63.6

52.8%Effective FG%53.0%

15.5%Turnover Rate14.0%

30.0%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

36.1%Free Throw Rate38.1%

1.9Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–57.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–112.4), defensive efficiency (101.4–109.7), net efficiency (11.2–2.7).

Wake Forest COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.2–4.6), recent form (-0.1–-4.7), offensive rebounding (30.0–27.0).

Final

Wake Forest

62—71

Clemson

Clemson by 9 • 59.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Wake ForestTEAM STATClemson

22-50FG26-64

44.0%FG%41.0%

10-223PT10-31

45.0%3PT%32.0%

8-13FT9-15

62.0%FT%60.0%

33Rebounds40

7Offensive Rebounds17

12Assists11

12Turnovers4

2Steals7

2Blocks5

14Fouls10

Player Box Score

Wake Forest

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Juke Harris	G	40	7-12	3-7	5-6	2	4	1	0	22
Nate Calmese	G	25	7-14	3-5	3-3	0	1	0	0	20
Tre'Von Spillers	F	32	6-9	3-4	0-0	12	3	0	2	15
Omaha Biliew	F	26	1-2	1-1	0-0	6	0	0	0	3
Sebastian Akins	G	15	1-5	0-2	0-0	0	2	0	0	2
Myles Colvin	G	22	0-2	0-0	0-2	6	1	1	0	0
Cooper Schwieger	F	20	0-4	0-1	0-2	3	0	0	0	0
Mekhi Mason	G	20	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
RJ Godfrey	F	25	4-10	0-0	3-7	8	1	0	2	11
Chase Thompson	F	19	4-7	1-3	0-0	3	0	0	0	9
Dillon Hunter	G	28	2-8	0-3	4-4	2	2	1	0	8
Butta Johnson	G	24	2-6	2-5	2-2	2	3	1	0	8
Nick Davidson	F	22	4-8	0-3	0-2	7	1	0	0	8
Ace Buckner	G	22	3-7	2-5	0-0	5	3	1	0	8
Dallas Thomas	F	10	2-3	2-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Jestin Porter	G	22	2-9	1-6	0-0	1	0	2	1	5
Carter Welling	F	12	2-4	1-2	0-0	4	0	1	2	5
Jake Wahlin	F	16	1-2	1-2	0-0	4	1	0	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

59.7Possessions59.7

103.9Offensive Efficiency118.9

118.9Defensive Efficiency103.9

-15.1Net Efficiency15.1

54.0%Effective FG%48.4%

55.2%True Shooting %49.9%

19.6%Turnover Rate6.9%

26.0%Free Throw Rate23.4%

44.0%3-Point Rate48.4%

1.00Assist / Turnover2.75

Game Summary

Clemson won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 59.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.