
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.5%SMU
73.5%Louisville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL163.7
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -277

Louisville
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 78
Projected Total163.7
Projected ScoreLouisville 86
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index67.1
118.2Offensive Efficiency118.6
109.6Defensive Efficiency102.2
8.6Net Efficiency16.4
7.0Strength of Schedule6.0
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
71.1Tempo71.0
55.7%Effective FG%56.9%
15.7%Turnover Rate16.8%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
31.3%Free Throw Rate34.1%
6.1Average Margin11.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Louisville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–62.5), offensive efficiency (118.6–118.2), defensive efficiency (102.2–109.6), net efficiency (16.4–8.6).
SMU COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.0–6.0), ball security (15.7–16.8), offensive rebounding (35.0–32.3).