SMU logo

SMU

20-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.5%SMU
73.5%Louisville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL163.7
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -277
Louisville logo

Louisville

24-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 78
Projected Total163.7
Projected ScoreLouisville 86

Team Comparison

62.5MMH Power Index67.1
118.2Offensive Efficiency118.6
109.6Defensive Efficiency102.2
8.6Net Efficiency16.4
7.0Strength of Schedule6.0
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
71.1Tempo71.0
55.7%Effective FG%56.9%
15.7%Turnover Rate16.8%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
31.3%Free Throw Rate34.1%
6.1Average Margin11.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Louisville HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
83
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–62.5), offensive efficiency (118.6–118.2), defensive efficiency (102.2–109.6), net efficiency (16.4–8.6).
SMU COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.0–6.0), ball security (15.7–16.8), offensive rebounding (35.0–32.3).
Final
SMU logo
SMU
5862
Louisville logo
Louisville
Louisville by 461.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SMUTEAM STATLouisville
24-56FG21-53
43.0%FG%40.0%
9-273PT6-26
33.0%3PT%23.0%
1-3FT14-20
33.0%FT%70.0%
34Rebounds32
11Offensive Rebounds10
10Assists8
14Turnovers10
5Steals6
5Blocks2
16Fouls12

Player Box Score

SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaron Pierre Jr.G396-105-90-040000017
Jaden ToombsC326-110-11-292330013
Corey WashingtonF274-72-40-010100010
Boopie MillerG384-170-80-08410008
Sam WaltersF112-41-20-01100005
B.J. Davis-RayG71-21-10-01000003
Samet YigitogluC311-30-00-17301002
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.F150-20-20-01001000
Louisville
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ryan ConwellG336-152-92-230000016
Adrian WooleyG363-91-57-862000014
Isaac McKneelyG392-92-74-575100010
J'Vonne HadleyG344-81-30-04030009
Vangelis ZougrisF183-40-01-34100007
Sananda FruF151-10-00-22000002
Kobe RodgersG131-40-10-00010002
Aly KhalifaC61-30-10-00011002
Khani RoothsF60-00-00-02001000

Advanced Game Stats

61.5Possessions61.5
94.3Offensive Efficiency100.8
100.8Defensive Efficiency94.3
-6.5Net Efficiency6.5
50.9%Effective FG%45.3%
50.5%True Shooting %49.6%
23.2%Turnover Rate16.0%
5.4%Free Throw Rate37.7%
48.2%3-Point Rate49.1%
0.71Assist / Turnover0.80
Game Summary
Louisville won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 61.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.