LSU logo

LSU

15-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.9%LSU
83.1%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -10.6
PROJECTED TOTAL161.2
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -492
Kentucky logo

Kentucky

22-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 75
Projected Total161.2
Projected ScoreKentucky 86

Team Comparison

54.2MMH Power Index63.9
115.5Offensive Efficiency115.2
111.3Defensive Efficiency106.3
4.2Net Efficiency8.9
4.5Strength of Schedule8.7
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
70.5Tempo69.9
53.4%Effective FG%53.2%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.4%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
41.9%Free Throw Rate38.0%
2.9Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Kentucky HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
73
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–54.2), defensive efficiency (106.3–111.3), net efficiency (8.9–4.2), strength of schedule (8.7–4.5).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.5–115.2), shooting efficiency (53.4–53.2), free throw rate (41.9–38.0).
Final
LSU logo
LSU
8287
Kentucky logo
Kentucky
Kentucky by 570.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LSUTEAM STATKentucky
32-64FG32-64
50.0%FG%50.0%
5-203PT6-22
25.0%3PT%27.0%
13-20FT17-23
65.0%FT%74.0%
35Rebounds33
11Offensive Rebounds11
11Assists15
9Turnovers5
1Steals5
2Blocks3
17Fouls16

Player Box Score

LSU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Max MackinnonG3311-172-64-641000028
Mike NwokoF355-90-06-8122000016
Jalen ReeceG385-110-41-267100011
Marquel SuttonF365-121-20-070010011
Rashad KingG193-61-40-00000007
Pablo TambaF302-50-02-44101006
PJ CarterG91-41-40-00000003
Kentucky
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Otega OwehG398-190-37-1083100023
Brandon GarrisonF267-92-31-252220017
Denzel AberdeenG376-131-53-423100016
Collin ChandlerG313-81-51-21300008
Mouhamed DioubateF213-60-11-17200007
Andrija JelavicF143-41-20-03001007
Malachi MorenoC120-10-04-43000004
Kam WilliamsG171-31-30-02110003
Jasper JohnsonG31-10-00-00100002

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2
116.8Offensive Efficiency123.9
123.9Defensive Efficiency116.8
-7.1Net Efficiency7.1
53.9%Effective FG%54.7%
55.8%True Shooting %58.1%
12.6%Turnover Rate7.3%
31.3%Free Throw Rate35.9%
31.3%3-Point Rate34.4%
1.22Assist / Turnover3.00
Game Summary
Kentucky won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.