
LSU
15-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.9%LSU
83.1%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -10.6
PROJECTED TOTAL161.2
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -492

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 75
Projected Total161.2
Projected ScoreKentucky 86
Team Comparison
54.2MMH Power Index63.9
115.5Offensive Efficiency115.2
111.3Defensive Efficiency106.3
4.2Net Efficiency8.9
4.5Strength of Schedule8.7
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
70.5Tempo69.9
53.4%Effective FG%53.2%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.4%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
41.9%Free Throw Rate38.0%
2.9Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–54.2), defensive efficiency (106.3–111.3), net efficiency (8.9–4.2), strength of schedule (8.7–4.5).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.5–115.2), shooting efficiency (53.4–53.2), free throw rate (41.9–38.0).