Rutgers logo

Rutgers

13-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.5%Rutgers
73.5%Minnesota
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMinnesota -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL141.9
MODEL MONEYLINEMinnesota -277
Minnesota logo

Minnesota

15-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRutgers 67
Projected Total141.9
Projected ScoreMinnesota 75

Team Comparison

45.9MMH Power Index50.5
104.2Offensive Efficiency109.1
112.2Defensive Efficiency107.7
-8.0Net Efficiency1.4
3.9Strength of Schedule3.2
-1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.6
67.4Tempo63.6
47.4%Effective FG%54.1%
15.0%Turnover Rate16.5%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %26.5%
36.3%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-5.4Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Minnesota HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
74
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMinnesota holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.5–45.9), offensive efficiency (109.1–104.2), defensive efficiency (107.7–112.2), net efficiency (1.4–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–3.2), recent form (-1.6–-6.6), ball security (15.0–16.5).
Final
Rutgers logo
Rutgers
7267
Minnesota logo
Minnesota
Rutgers by 563.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RutgersTEAM STATMinnesota
25-54FG25-48
46.0%FG%52.0%
10-233PT9-21
43.0%3PT%43.0%
12-17FT8-12
71.0%FT%67.0%
27Rebounds26
8Offensive Rebounds5
22Assists23
10Turnovers15
7Steals6
6Blocks4
11Fouls17

Player Box Score

Rutgers
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tariq FrancisG359-165-76-734100029
Jamichael DavisG283-73-64-446110013
Emmanuel OgboleC285-60-00-270130010
Harun ZrnoG212-52-52-21020008
Dylan GrantF253-60-10-03222006
Darren Buchanan Jr.G243-60-00-25700006
Lino MarkG180-50-20-01300000
Denis BadalauF110-20-10-02000000
Kaden PowersG60-10-10-00000000
Bryce DortchF40-00-00-00000000
Minnesota
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cade TysonG409-133-73-341000024
Bobby DurkinF394-104-93-444110015
Grayson GroveF335-70-00-265020010
Isaac AsumaG373-81-32-31310009
Langston ReynoldsG383-80-00-07800006
Kai ShinholsterG131-21-20-01241003

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9
112.7Offensive Efficiency104.9
104.9Defensive Efficiency112.7
7.8Net Efficiency-7.8
55.6%Effective FG%61.5%
58.0%True Shooting %62.4%
15.6%Turnover Rate23.5%
31.5%Free Throw Rate25.0%
42.6%3-Point Rate43.8%
2.20Assist / Turnover1.53
Game Summary
Rutgers won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.