Auburn logo

Auburn

21-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
27.3%Auburn
72.7%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -8.3
PROJECTED TOTAL158.3
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -266
Tennessee logo

Tennessee

25-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAuburn 75
Projected Total158.3
Projected ScoreTennessee 83

Team Comparison

64.4MMH Power Index68.6
118.8Offensive Efficiency115.8
113.0Defensive Efficiency102.1
5.8Net Efficiency13.7
7.5Strength of Schedule7.8
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
69.8Tempo68.1
53.1%Effective FG%51.6%
14.5%Turnover Rate17.3%
36.5%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
43.8%Free Throw Rate38.6%
4.1Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tennessee HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
65
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–64.4), defensive efficiency (102.1–113.0), net efficiency (13.7–5.8), strength of schedule (7.8–7.5).
Auburn COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.8–115.8), recent form (8.0–3.3), shooting efficiency (53.1–51.6).
Final
Auburn logo
Auburn
6272
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
Tennessee by 1063.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AuburnTEAM STATTennessee
21-60FG22-51
35.0%FG%43.0%
7-263PT4-13
27.0%3PT%31.0%
13-20FT24-32
65.0%FT%75.0%
40Rebounds39
16Offensive Rebounds10
6Assists15
12Turnovers6
2Steals8
3Blocks9
25Fouls17

Player Box Score

Auburn
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tahaad PettifordG379-185-105-641110028
Keyshawn HallF354-141-61-261000010
Kevin OvertonG343-81-42-24000009
KeShawn MurphyF273-40-12-63200008
Sebastian Williams-AdamsF312-80-23-47101007
Elyjah FreemanG180-60-20-06111000
Filip JovicF120-10-00-01000000
Blake MuschalekG60-10-10-01000000
Tennessee
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate AmentF327-154-69-1384130027
Ja'Kobi GillespieG365-110-25-723300015
Jaylen CareyF253-60-03-47210009
Felix OkparaF302-60-02-27122006
Amari EvansG182-50-11-24101005
J.P. EstrellaF172-20-00-03101004
DeWayne Brown IIF81-10-02-21001004
Bishop BoswellG310-50-42-23301002
Ethan BurgG30-00-00-02010000

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9
97.0Offensive Efficiency112.7
112.7Defensive Efficiency97.0
-15.6Net Efficiency15.6
40.8%Effective FG%47.1%
44.6%True Shooting %54.4%
18.3%Turnover Rate9.6%
33.3%Free Throw Rate62.7%
43.3%3-Point Rate25.5%
0.50Assist / Turnover2.50
Game Summary
Tennessee won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.