Northwestern logo

Northwestern

15-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.6%Northwestern
92.4%Purdue
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -16.3
PROJECTED TOTAL150.4
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1216
Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNorthwestern 67
Projected Total150.4
Projected ScorePurdue 83

Team Comparison

55.4MMH Power Index73.2
111.6Offensive Efficiency124.8
109.8Defensive Efficiency107.8
1.8Net Efficiency17.0
5.6Strength of Schedule7.6
-2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
65.6Tempo65.4
51.9%Effective FG%57.8%
13.0%Turnover Rate13.7%
28.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
34.8%Free Throw Rate29.1%
1.2Average Margin11.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–55.4), offensive efficiency (124.8–111.6), defensive efficiency (107.8–109.8), net efficiency (17.0–1.8).
Northwestern COUNTERS WITHball security (13.0–13.7), free throw rate (34.8–29.1).
Final
Northwestern logo
Northwestern
6881
Purdue logo
Purdue
Purdue by 1359.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NorthwesternTEAM STATPurdue
28-53FG30-61
53.0%FG%49.0%
6-143PT8-23
43.0%3PT%35.0%
6-8FT13-17
75.0%FT%76.0%
23Rebounds35
7Offensive Rebounds16
22Assists25
9Turnovers7
3Steals4
2Blocks2
17Fouls12

Player Box Score

Northwestern
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nick MartinelliF3910-161-14-543100025
Jayden ReidG368-123-40-029110019
Jordan ClaytonG234-72-50-034000010
Tyler KroppF192-50-02-33200006
Angelo CiaravinoG292-60-00-04301004
Jake WestG291-40-30-01100002
Tre SingletonF181-10-00-05010002
Justin MullinsG60-20-10-00000000
Phoenix GillG10-00-00-00000000
Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trey Kaufman-RennF308-90-03-662000019
Oscar CluffC307-100-05-5102110019
Fletcher LoyerG285-122-72-213100014
Omer MayerG133-62-40-00200008
Gicarri HarrisG152-22-20-02000006
Braden SmithG362-81-40-021621005
C.J. CoxG282-81-40-07000005
Daniel JacobsenC101-40-03-41000005
Jack BenterG100-20-20-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

59.5Possessions59.5
114.3Offensive Efficiency136.1
136.1Defensive Efficiency114.3
-21.8Net Efficiency21.8
58.5%Effective FG%55.7%
59.9%True Shooting %58.6%
15.3%Turnover Rate11.7%
15.1%Free Throw Rate27.9%
26.4%3-Point Rate37.7%
2.44Assist / Turnover3.57
Game Summary
Purdue won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 59.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.