
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%Tulane
74.4%Charlotte
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharlotte -7.4
PROJECTED TOTAL149.4
MODEL MONEYLINECharlotte -291

Charlotte
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 71
Projected Total149.4
Projected ScoreCharlotte 78
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index49.3
105.3Offensive Efficiency111.6
109.9Defensive Efficiency113.3
-4.6Net Efficiency-1.7
2.7Strength of Schedule2.9
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
68.7Tempo65.7
49.6%Effective FG%53.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate18.2%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
44.8%Free Throw Rate37.2%
-3.2Average Margin-1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Charlotte HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCharlotte holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.3–44.3), offensive efficiency (111.6–105.3), net efficiency (-1.7–-4.6), strength of schedule (2.9–2.7).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.9–113.3), ball security (15.6–18.2), free throw rate (44.8–37.2).