
Rutgers
13-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.2%Rutgers
91.8%UCLA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -16.3
PROJECTED TOTAL148.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -1120

UCLA
24-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRutgers 66
Projected Total148.3
Projected ScoreUCLA 82
Team Comparison
45.9MMH Power Index63
104.2Offensive Efficiency115.9
112.2Defensive Efficiency106.9
-8.0Net Efficiency9.0
3.9Strength of Schedule5.1
-1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
67.4Tempo66.5
47.4%Effective FG%53.5%
15.0%Turnover Rate13.4%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
36.3%Free Throw Rate33.8%
-5.4Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–45.9), offensive efficiency (115.9–104.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–112.2), net efficiency (9.0–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.3–33.8).