Rutgers logo

Rutgers

13-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.2%Rutgers
91.8%UCLA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -16.3
PROJECTED TOTAL148.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -1120
UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRutgers 66
Projected Total148.3
Projected ScoreUCLA 82

Team Comparison

45.9MMH Power Index63
104.2Offensive Efficiency115.9
112.2Defensive Efficiency106.9
-8.0Net Efficiency9.0
3.9Strength of Schedule5.1
-1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
67.4Tempo66.5
47.4%Effective FG%53.5%
15.0%Turnover Rate13.4%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
36.3%Free Throw Rate33.8%
-5.4Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–45.9), offensive efficiency (115.9–104.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–112.2), net efficiency (9.0–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.3–33.8).
Final
Rutgers logo
Rutgers
5972
UCLA logo
UCLA
UCLA by 1368.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RutgersTEAM STATUCLA
22-58FG23-60
38.0%FG%38.0%
6-193PT7-23
32.0%3PT%30.0%
9-10FT19-23
90.0%FT%83.0%
30Rebounds40
7Offensive Rebounds12
14Assists18
13Turnovers10
5Steals7
4Blocks4
17Fouls14

Player Box Score

Rutgers
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Lino MarkG296-111-34-555100017
Darren Buchanan Jr.G364-110-11-19310009
Harun ZrnoG313-53-50-03010009
Emmanuel OgboleC314-50-00-05102008
Tariq FrancisG262-110-52-21520006
Jamichael DavisG222-71-30-00000005
Dylan GrantF181-61-22-23002005
Kaden PowersG70-20-00-02000000
UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyler BilodeauF295-113-78-850000021
Donovan DentG396-140-10-01012100012
Trent PerryG342-82-56-744110012
Eric Dailey Jr.G253-70-14-660000010
Xavier BookerF152-51-41-22002006
Skyy ClarkG312-71-40-02210005
Brandon WilliamsG101-30-00-04030002
Eric FreenyG101-30-00-02001002
Jamar BrownG71-20-10-00010002

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9
85.6Offensive Efficiency104.5
104.5Defensive Efficiency85.6
-18.9Net Efficiency18.9
43.1%Effective FG%44.2%
47.0%True Shooting %50.8%
18.9%Turnover Rate14.5%
17.2%Free Throw Rate38.3%
32.8%3-Point Rate38.3%
1.08Assist / Turnover1.80
Game Summary
UCLA won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.