Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.0%Clemson

95.0%Duke

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuke -18.9

PROJECTED TOTAL140.4

MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -1900

Duke

35-3

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 61

Projected Total140.4

Projected ScoreDuke 80

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricDuke

59.9MMH Power Index81.7

112.6Offensive Efficiency122.2

101.4Defensive Efficiency95.2

11.2Net Efficiency27.0

4.6Strength of Schedule7.8

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency18.7

63.6Tempo66.8

53.0%Effective FG%56.9%

14.0%Turnover Rate15.9%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %38.2%

38.1%Free Throw Rate39.0%

7.2Average Margin18.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–59.9), offensive efficiency (122.2–112.6), defensive efficiency (95.2–101.4), net efficiency (27.0–11.2).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHball security (14.0–15.9).

Final

Clemson

61—73

Duke

Duke by 12 • 63.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATDuke

18-55FG23-50

33.0%FG%46.0%

7-253PT9-24

28.0%3PT%38.0%

18-23FT18-22

78.0%FT%82.0%

27Rebounds41

8Offensive Rebounds9

10Assists9

6Turnovers11

7Steals4

3Blocks1

17Fouls20

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
RJ Godfrey	F	27	6-11	0-0	6-6	6	1	1	1	18
Jestin Porter	G	27	4-7	3-5	1-2	2	1	0	0	12
Ace Buckner	G	28	2-10	1-4	6-6	2	2	2	0	11
Butta Johnson	G	30	2-8	1-6	3-5	1	1	0	1	8
Chase Thompson	F	12	2-3	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	5
Dillon Hunter	G	31	1-6	1-3	1-2	3	4	0	1	4
Nick Davidson	F	27	1-5	0-2	1-2	5	1	1	0	3
Jake Wahlin	F	14	0-3	0-3	0-0	3	0	1	0	0
Dallas Thomas	F	4	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Duke

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cameron Boozer	F	37	6-9	3-4	9-12	14	5	0	1	24
Cayden Boozer	G	37	6-12	1-2	3-3	3	1	0	0	16
Nikolas Khamenia	G	31	5-10	3-6	1-1	6	1	1	0	14
Dame Sarr	G	28	3-7	1-4	1-2	3	0	1	0	8
Isaiah Evans	G	32	1-9	0-7	4-4	10	2	0	0	6
Darren Harris	G	14	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Maliq Brown	F	21	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	2	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

63.2Possessions63.2

96.5Offensive Efficiency115.5

115.5Defensive Efficiency96.5

-19.0Net Efficiency19.0

39.1%Effective FG%55.0%

46.3%True Shooting %60.4%

9.4%Turnover Rate17.6%

41.8%Free Throw Rate44.0%

45.5%3-Point Rate48.0%

1.67Assist / Turnover0.82

Game Summary

Duke won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 63.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.