Ohio State logo

Ohio State

21-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.8%Ohio State
91.2%Michigan
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMichigan -16.6
PROJECTED TOTAL158.0
MODEL MONEYLINEMichigan -1036
Michigan logo

Michigan

36-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOhio State 71
Projected Total158.0
Projected ScoreMichigan 87

Team Comparison

64.5MMH Power Index80.9
118.1Offensive Efficiency122.3
108.1Defensive Efficiency97.0
10.0Net Efficiency25.3
6.4Strength of Schedule8.7
6.3Last 10 Net Efficiency17.2
67.2Tempo71.8
56.9%Effective FG%58.8%
15.3%Turnover Rate16.4%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %34.6%
38.3%Free Throw Rate38.9%
6.7Average Margin18.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Michigan HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMichigan holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (80.9–64.5), offensive efficiency (122.3–118.1), defensive efficiency (97.0–108.1), net efficiency (25.3–10.0).
Ohio State COUNTERS WITHball security (15.3–16.4).
Final
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
6771
Michigan logo
Michigan
Michigan by 467.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Ohio StateTEAM STATMichigan
22-58FG24-53
38.0%FG%45.0%
8-243PT5-17
33.0%3PT%29.0%
15-18FT18-24
83.0%FT%75.0%
32Rebounds34
10Offensive Rebounds6
11Assists17
10Turnovers9
6Steals7
4Blocks6
17Fouls16

Player Box Score

Ohio State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Bruce ThorntonG396-142-56-634110020
John Mobley Jr.G266-142-70-021000014
Devin RoyalF364-122-43-4111200013
Christoph TillyC302-60-24-65110008
Amare BynumF341-51-42-26302005
Gabe CuppsG172-31-10-01100005
Brandon NoelF121-30-10-02010002
Ivan NjegovanC40-10-00-00011000
Puff JohnsonG20-00-00-00000000
Michigan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Aday MaraC287-110-03-371120017
Elliot CadeauG373-91-58-1027300015
Trey McKenneyG275-82-50-040110012
Morez Johnson Jr.F285-111-10-071010011
Yaxel LendeborgF351-40-24-65620006
Nimari BurnettG182-41-21-21100006
Roddy Gayle Jr.G201-60-22-34102004
Will TschetterF70-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.0Possessions67.0
100.0Offensive Efficiency106.0
106.0Defensive Efficiency100.0
-6.0Net Efficiency6.0
44.8%Effective FG%50.0%
50.3%True Shooting %55.1%
15.0%Turnover Rate13.4%
31.0%Free Throw Rate45.3%
41.4%3-Point Rate32.1%
1.10Assist / Turnover1.89
Game Summary
Michigan won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 67.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.