
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.8%Tennessee
63.2%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL157.6
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -172

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 77
Projected Total157.6
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 81
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index68.9
115.8Offensive Efficiency120.9
102.1Defensive Efficiency105.7
13.7Net Efficiency15.2
7.8Strength of Schedule7.4
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
68.1Tempo70.9
51.6%Effective FG%55.3%
17.3%Turnover Rate13.5%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
38.6%Free Throw Rate39.3%
9.3Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–68.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.8), net efficiency (15.2–13.7), shooting efficiency (55.3–51.6).
Tennessee COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–105.7), strength of schedule (7.8–7.4), recent form (3.3–2.7).