Purdue

30-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

54.5%Purdue

45.5%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL149.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -120

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePurdue 74

Projected Total149.2

Projected ScoreNebraska 75

Team Comparison

PurdueMetricNebraska

73.2MMH Power Index67

124.8Offensive Efficiency114.4

107.8Defensive Efficiency98.3

17.0Net Efficiency16.1

7.6Strength of Schedule6.1

11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

65.4Tempo67.3

57.8%Effective FG%55.6%

13.7%Turnover Rate14.4%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

29.1%Free Throw Rate26.9%

11.1Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–67.0), offensive efficiency (124.8–114.4), net efficiency (17.0–16.1), strength of schedule (7.6–6.1).

Nebraska COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–107.8).

Final

Purdue

74—58

Nebraska

Purdue by 16 • 60.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATNebraska

26-58FG22-56

45.0%FG%39.0%

10-313PT10-31

32.0%3PT%32.0%

12-14FT4-9

86.0%FT%44.0%

37Rebounds29

13Offensive Rebounds10

20Assists15

9Turnovers10

6Steals4

2Blocks2

12Fouls12

Player Box Score

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Fletcher Loyer	G	32	5-10	4-9	5-6	4	1	2	0	19
Oscar Cluff	C	35	6-8	0-0	0-1	9	2	1	1	12
C.J. Cox	G	22	3-10	3-9	3-3	3	1	0	0	12
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	30	4-8	0-0	2-2	9	3	1	1	10
Omer Mayer	G	16	4-8	1-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	9
Braden Smith	G	37	1-8	1-5	2-2	5	10	1	0	5
Gicarri Harris	G	14	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	2	1	0	3
Jack Benter	G	10	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Daniel Jacobsen	C	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Pryce Sandfort	F	35	6-14	3-8	0-0	4	2	0	0	15
Rienk Mast	F	31	4-9	3-8	0-0	2	3	0	0	11
Braden Frager	F	19	3-6	1-3	1-2	1	1	0	0	8
Jamarques Lawrence	G	27	2-7	0-4	2-3	0	1	1	0	6
Jared Garcia	F	13	2-8	2-5	0-0	4	1	1	0	6
Sam Hoiberg	G	33	2-6	1-3	0-0	8	4	1	0	5
Cale Jacobsen	G	20	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	2	1	2	4
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	20	1-3	0-0	1-4	3	1	0	0	3
Kendall Blue	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.5Possessions60.5

122.3Offensive Efficiency95.9

95.9Defensive Efficiency122.3

26.4Net Efficiency-26.4

53.4%Effective FG%48.2%

57.2%True Shooting %48.1%

14.8%Turnover Rate16.6%

24.1%Free Throw Rate16.1%

53.4%3-Point Rate55.4%

2.22Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Purdue won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 60.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.