
UT Arlington
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.3%UT Arlington
82.7%Utah Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -11.2
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -478

Utah Valley
25-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 66
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreUtah Valley 77
Team Comparison
49.6MMH Power Index59.1
102.7Offensive Efficiency113.4
97.9Defensive Efficiency97.3
4.8Net Efficiency16.1
-0.8Strength of Schedule-3.3
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8
68.1Tempo70.6
48.5%Effective FG%56.0%
20.4%Turnover Rate19.9%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
43.7%Free Throw Rate37.3%
3.3Average Margin11.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–49.6), offensive efficiency (113.4–102.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–97.9), net efficiency (16.1–4.8).
UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.8–-3.3), free throw rate (43.7–37.3).