Vermont logo

Vermont

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.5%Vermont
76.5%UMBC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -8.3
PROJECTED TOTAL140.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -326
UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVermont 66
Projected Total140.0
Projected ScoreUMBC 74

Team Comparison

53.1MMH Power Index59.1
112.2Offensive Efficiency113.0
104.7Defensive Efficiency99.0
7.5Net Efficiency14.0
-4.4Strength of Schedule-5.6
12.4Last 10 Net Efficiency24.7
65.4Tempo65.5
54.1%Effective FG%54.3%
14.4%Turnover Rate14.3%
26.8%Offensive Rebound %25.2%
32.4%Free Throw Rate34.1%
4.9Average Margin9.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–53.1), offensive efficiency (113.0–112.2), defensive efficiency (99.0–104.7), net efficiency (14.0–7.5).
Vermont COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.4–-5.6), offensive rebounding (26.8–25.2).
Final
Vermont logo
Vermont
5974
UMBC logo
UMBC
UMBC by 1564.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VermontTEAM STATUMBC
25-59FG21-51
42.0%FG%41.0%
5-273PT10-26
19.0%3PT%38.0%
4-10FT22-26
40.0%FT%85.0%
30Rebounds32
8Offensive Rebounds8
6Assists6
8Turnovers9
2Steals3
3Blocks3
18Fouls8

Player Box Score

Vermont
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
TJ LongG317-143-80-040210017
TJ HurleyG335-121-80-221000011
Gus YaldenF245-130-41-250000011
Sean BlakeG323-60-11-26200007
Lucas MariG272-61-41-28101006
Noah BarnettF232-30-01-22000005
Momo NkugwaG161-40-10-01201002
Ben JohnsonG100-10-10-01000000
Jackson SkipperF40-00-00-00000000
UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
DJ Armstrong Jr.G369-117-98-920000033
Ace ValentineG383-100-57-734100013
Josh OdunowoF251-30-06-65101008
Jose Roberto TanchynF343-101-40-010002007
Caden DiggsF253-50-11-46020007
Cougar DowningG62-42-40-00000006
Jah'Likai KingG300-80-30-01100000
Riley JacobsF60-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.1Possessions64.1
92.0Offensive Efficiency115.4
115.4Defensive Efficiency92.0
-23.4Net Efficiency23.4
46.6%Effective FG%51.0%
46.3%True Shooting %58.4%
12.5%Turnover Rate14.0%
16.9%Free Throw Rate51.0%
45.8%3-Point Rate51.0%
0.75Assist / Turnover0.67
Game Summary
UMBC won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 64.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.