Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.3%Vanderbilt

84.7%Florida

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida -11.3

PROJECTED TOTAL164.0

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida -554

Florida

27-8

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 76

Projected Total164.0

Projected ScoreFlorida 88

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricFlorida

68.9MMH Power Index79.7

120.9Offensive Efficiency120.9

105.7Defensive Efficiency99.3

15.2Net Efficiency21.6

7.4Strength of Schedule7.1

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency24.2

70.9Tempo72.0

55.3%Effective FG%54.2%

13.5%Turnover Rate16.3%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %42.8%

39.3%Free Throw Rate39.8%

10.8Average Margin15.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (79.7–68.9), defensive efficiency (99.3–105.7), net efficiency (21.6–15.2), recent form (24.2–2.7).

Vanderbilt COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.4–7.1), shooting efficiency (55.3–54.2), ball security (13.5–16.3).

Final

Vanderbilt

91—74

Florida

Vanderbilt by 17 • 63.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATFlorida

30-55FG26-57

55.0%FG%46.0%

10-213PT5-17

48.0%3PT%29.0%

21-23FT17-23

91.0%FT%74.0%

23Rebounds38

8Offensive Rebounds20

21Assists13

8Turnovers14

8Steals5

3Blocks3

19Fouls21

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	37	8-10	1-1	3-4	2	8	3	0	20
Jalen Washington	C	26	6-8	1-1	4-4	4	1	0	1	17
Duke Miles	G	33	2-7	1-3	10-10	3	7	3	0	15
Devin McGlockton	F	30	4-8	3-4	1-2	4	1	0	0	12
AK Okereke	F	19	4-8	3-5	0-0	3	3	0	0	11
Tyler Nickel	F	28	3-10	1-6	0-0	1	1	2	0	7
Chandler Bing	G	20	2-3	0-1	3-3	3	0	0	1	7
Jayden Leverett	C	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	2

Florida

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Thomas Haugh	F	35	5-14	1-4	8-10	9	3	1	1	19
Boogie Fland	G	34	5-9	1-3	4-4	1	4	0	0	15
Alex Condon	F	31	6-10	1-1	0-2	7	2	0	0	13
Rueben Chinyelu	C	30	5-6	0-0	2-3	6	0	1	0	12
Xaivian Lee	G	30	2-8	1-5	2-2	2	4	2	0	7
Urban Klavzar	G	16	2-3	1-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	5
Isaiah Brown	G	16	1-7	0-3	1-2	4	0	1	1	3
Micah Handlogten	C	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9

142.4Offensive Efficiency115.8

115.8Defensive Efficiency142.4

26.6Net Efficiency-26.6

63.6%Effective FG%50.0%

69.0%True Shooting %54.5%

12.1%Turnover Rate22.6%

41.8%Free Throw Rate40.4%

38.2%3-Point Rate29.8%

2.63Assist / Turnover0.93

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.