
Pennsylvania
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.3%Pennsylvania
61.7%Harvard
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL143.9
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -161

Harvard
17-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 70
Projected Total143.9
Projected ScoreHarvard 74
Team Comparison
52.9MMH Power Index52.6
108.6Offensive Efficiency108.1
106.4Defensive Efficiency102.9
2.2Net Efficiency5.2
1.9Strength of Schedule-0.1
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3
69.9Tempo64.8
50.9%Effective FG%53.4%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.2%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
36.3%Free Throw Rate27.9%
1.5Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–52.6), offensive efficiency (108.6–108.1), strength of schedule (1.9–-0.1), ball security (15.4–17.2).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–106.4), net efficiency (5.2–2.2), recent form (8.3–2.3).