Purdue

30-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

65.2%Purdue

34.8%UCLA

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -2.7

PROJECTED TOTAL152.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -187

UCLA

24-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePurdue 77

Projected Total152.2

Projected ScoreUCLA 75

Team Comparison

PurdueMetricUCLA

73.2MMH Power Index63

124.8Offensive Efficiency115.9

107.8Defensive Efficiency106.9

17.0Net Efficiency9.0

7.6Strength of Schedule5.1

11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

65.4Tempo66.5

57.8%Effective FG%53.5%

13.7%Turnover Rate13.4%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %30.7%

29.1%Free Throw Rate33.8%

11.1Average Margin6.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–63.0), offensive efficiency (124.8–115.9), net efficiency (17.0–9.0), strength of schedule (7.6–5.1).

UCLA COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.9–107.8), ball security (13.4–13.7), free throw rate (33.8–29.1).

Final

Purdue

73—66

UCLA

Purdue by 7 • 59.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATUCLA

25-54FG25-57

46.0%FG%44.0%

10-283PT7-20

36.0%3PT%35.0%

13-19FT9-11

68.0%FT%82.0%

37Rebounds26

13Offensive Rebounds9

21Assists18

10Turnovers6

5Steals8

3Blocks1

10Fouls15

Player Box Score

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Oscar Cluff	C	28	6-11	0-0	5-7	14	2	1	1	17
Fletcher Loyer	G	27	4-11	4-10	2-4	2	4	2	1	14
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	27	5-7	0-0	2-2	10	1	0	0	12
Jack Benter	G	15	3-3	2-2	0-0	6	0	1	0	8
Braden Smith	G	32	1-7	1-5	2-4	1	9	0	0	5
C.J. Cox	G	28	2-5	1-4	0-0	1	4	0	0	5
Omer Mayer	G	16	1-5	1-4	2-2	0	1	0	0	5
Daniel Jacobsen	C	9	2-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	4
Gicarri Harris	G	18	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3

UCLA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trent Perry	G	40	4-12	1-4	6-6	3	9	1	0	15
Xavier Booker	F	27	5-10	2-4	0-0	1	0	1	0	12
Eric Dailey Jr.	G	34	5-12	1-3	0-0	10	3	1	0	11
Skyy Clark	G	31	4-11	1-5	1-2	2	3	4	0	10
Eric Freeny	G	23	3-4	2-3	0-0	5	2	0	0	8
Steven Jamerson II	F	13	2-2	0-0	1-1	1	0	1	0	5
Brandon Williams	G	20	1-2	0-1	1-2	1	0	0	1	3
Donovan Dent	G	10	1-4	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Jamar Brown	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

59.6Possessions59.6

122.5Offensive Efficiency110.7

110.7Defensive Efficiency122.5

11.7Net Efficiency-11.7

55.6%Effective FG%50.0%

57.9%True Shooting %53.0%

16.7%Turnover Rate10.1%

35.2%Free Throw Rate19.3%

51.9%3-Point Rate35.1%

2.10Assist / Turnover3.00

Game Summary

Purdue won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 59.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.