
Pennsylvania
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.0%Pennsylvania
87.0%Yale
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADYale -12.8
PROJECTED TOTAL150.2
MODEL MONEYLINEYale -669

Yale
23-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 69
Projected Total150.2
Projected ScoreYale 82
Team Comparison
52.9MMH Power Index65.4
108.6Offensive Efficiency121.4
106.4Defensive Efficiency105.8
2.2Net Efficiency15.6
1.9Strength of Schedule1.6
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.9
69.9Tempo64.5
50.9%Effective FG%56.8%
15.4%Turnover Rate13.9%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
36.3%Free Throw Rate34.4%
1.5Average Margin10.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Yale HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–52.9), offensive efficiency (121.4–108.6), defensive efficiency (105.8–106.4), net efficiency (15.6–2.2).
Pennsylvania COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–1.6), free throw rate (36.3–34.4).