
Lindenwood
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.1%Lindenwood
76.9%Ole Miss
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOle Miss -6.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.7
MODEL MONEYLINEOle Miss -333

Ole Miss
15-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLindenwood 74
Projected Total153.7
Projected ScoreOle Miss 80
Team Comparison
46.8MMH Power Index53
105.5Offensive Efficiency109.2
98.6Defensive Efficiency109.5
6.9Net Efficiency-0.3
-6.8Strength of Schedule5.4
-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3
73.7Tempo69.5
50.2%Effective FG%50.6%
18.3%Turnover Rate14.0%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %28.0%
37.9%Free Throw Rate33.8%
5.1Average Margin-0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (98.6–109.5), net efficiency (6.9–-0.3), recent form (-1.4–-2.3), offensive rebounding (34.0–28.0).
Ole Miss COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (53.0–46.8), offensive efficiency (109.2–105.5), strength of schedule (5.4–-6.8).