Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.1%Texas A&M
79.9%Texas Tech
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas Tech -9.2
PROJECTED TOTAL157.2
MODEL MONEYLINETexas Tech -398
Texas Tech logo

Texas Tech

23-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 74
Projected Total157.2
Projected ScoreTexas Tech 83

Team Comparison

58MMH Power Index65.8
116.1Offensive Efficiency117.8
108.4Defensive Efficiency107.2
7.7Net Efficiency10.6
4.8Strength of Schedule9.4
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency0.9
69.1Tempo68.1
53.5%Effective FG%56.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.8%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %32.6%
37.5%Free Throw Rate28.2%
5.3Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas Tech HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas Tech holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.8–58.0), offensive efficiency (117.8–116.1), defensive efficiency (107.2–108.4), net efficiency (10.6–7.7).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHball security (14.8–15.8), free throw rate (37.5–28.2).
Final
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
72—67
Texas Tech logo
Texas Tech
Texas A&M by 5 • 66.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATTexas Tech
25-67FG23-51
37.0%FG%45.0%
9-243PT12-31
38.0%3PT%39.0%
13-18FT9-12
72.0%FT%75.0%
37Rebounds35
18Offensive Rebounds9
13Assists18
9Turnovers18
9Steals6
4Blocks7
13Fouls16

Player Box Score

Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Wade Taylor IVGuard336-172-85-534200019
Jace CarterNot Available245-63-43-452100016
Zhuric PhelpsGuard265-172-60-012210012
Solomon WashingtonF312-52-32-29202008
Pharrel PayneF143-30-00-01100006
Manny ObasekiGuard133-120-10-01000006
Henry Coleman IIIForward271-40-03-55120005
Hayden HefnerGuard180-20-10-24111000
Andersson GarciaForward70-10-10-03000000
CJ WilcherGuard70-00-00-01010000
Texas Tech
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chance McMillianGuard307-145-104-450010023
Kevin OvertonG296-134-91-250010017
Darrion WilliamsF313-82-43-445020011
Elijah HawkinsGuard293-71-40-02503007
Federiko FederikoF263-30-01-26240007
Eemeli YalahoF161-20-10-03310002
Christian AndersonG210-30-20-02310000
Kerwin WaltonGuard180-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.2Possessions66.2
108.8Offensive Efficiency101.2
101.2Defensive Efficiency108.8
7.6Net Efficiency-7.6
44.0%Effective FG%56.9%
47.7%True Shooting %59.1%
13.5%Turnover Rate27.4%
26.9%Free Throw Rate23.5%
35.8%3-Point Rate60.8%
1.44Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 66.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.