Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

77.4%Hofstra

22.6%Norfolk State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -6.7

PROJECTED TOTAL147.3

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -342

Norfolk State

15-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 77

Projected Total147.3

Projected ScoreNorfolk State 70

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricNorfolk State

59.3MMH Power Index43.7

114.0Offensive Efficiency108.9

100.9Defensive Efficiency105.2

13.1Net Efficiency3.7

-2.9Strength of Schedule-9.4

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency0.6

66.2Tempo70.1

52.2%Effective FG%51.9%

16.1%Turnover Rate17.6%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %34.0%

32.0%Free Throw Rate44.6%

8.7Average Margin2.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–43.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–108.9), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.2), net efficiency (13.1–3.7).

Norfolk State COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (44.6–32.0).

Final

Hofstra

80—67

Norfolk State

Hofstra by 13 • 64.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATNorfolk State

27-45FG19-49

60.0%FG%39.0%

11-223PT5-15

50.0%3PT%33.0%

15-20FT24-26

75.0%FT%92.0%

28Rebounds20

6Offensive Rebounds6

14Assists9

15Turnovers10

7Steals4

6Blocks—

22Fouls19

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
KiJan Robinson	G	33	7-12	4-9	2-2	2	1	1	0	20
Cruz Davis	G	32	6-10	5-6	3-5	2	4	2	0	20
Jean Aranguren	G	40	6-10	2-4	5-7	7	6	1	0	19
Michael Graham	Forward	26	5-5	0-0	1-2	6	0	1	4	11
Silas Sunday	F	14	2-4	0-0	0-0	6	1	2	0	4
Khalil Farmer	G	12	0-1	0-1	4-4	0	0	0	0	4
German Plotnikov	G	31	1-2	0-1	0-0	3	2	0	2	2
Jaquan Sanders	G	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Norfolk State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jalen Myers	F	34	5-10	3-5	4-4	5	0	0	17
Christian Ings	Guard	32	4-11	0-2	4-4	3	5	1	12
Brian Moore Jr.	G	26	3-9	0-1	4-5	1	1	0	10
Sin'Cere McMahon	Not Available	22	2-4	1-3	4-5	0	0	1	9
Terrance Jones	G	16	2-3	1-2	4-4	2	0	1	9
Tyrel Bladen	Forward	23	2-5	0-0	2-2	3	0	1	6
Jaylani Darden	Guard	30	0-4	0-2	2-2	2	1	0	2
Chris Fields Jr.	F	11	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	2
Kuluel Mading	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.5Possessions64.5

124.0Offensive Efficiency103.9

103.9Defensive Efficiency124.0

20.2Net Efficiency-20.2

72.2%Effective FG%43.9%

73.4%True Shooting %54.6%

23.6%Turnover Rate15.3%

44.4%Free Throw Rate53.1%

48.9%3-Point Rate30.6%

0.93Assist / Turnover0.90

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 64.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.