
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.1%Colgate
89.9%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -14.5
PROJECTED TOTAL155.6
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -890

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 71
Projected Total155.6
Projected ScoreKentucky 85
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index63.9
111.7Offensive Efficiency115.2
109.0Defensive Efficiency106.3
2.7Net Efficiency8.9
-2.0Strength of Schedule8.7
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
68.4Tempo69.9
54.5%Effective FG%53.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
30.0%Free Throw Rate38.0%
1.8Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–48.8), offensive efficiency (115.2–111.7), defensive efficiency (106.3–109.0), net efficiency (8.9–2.7).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-0.3–-1.0), shooting efficiency (54.5–53.2), ball security (14.8–15.4).