
Boston University
16-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.2%Boston University
70.8%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -6.7
PROJECTED TOTAL142.2
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -242

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBoston University 68
Projected Total142.2
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index53.7
115.3Offensive Efficiency106.4
113.1Defensive Efficiency103.2
2.2Net Efficiency3.2
-2.7Strength of Schedule0.7
11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
65.4Tempo64.4
58.6%Effective FG%49.3%
17.7%Turnover Rate14.8%
27.4%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
32.2%Free Throw Rate39.5%
1.5Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–50.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–113.1), net efficiency (3.2–2.2), strength of schedule (0.7–-2.7).
Boston University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.3–106.4), shooting efficiency (58.6–49.3), offensive rebounding (27.4–24.7).