William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.6%William & Mary

75.4%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -7.9

PROJECTED TOTAL153.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -307

Hofstra

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 73

Projected Total153.9

Projected ScoreHofstra 81

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricHofstra

53.8MMH Power Index59.3

112.5Offensive Efficiency114.0

105.2Defensive Efficiency100.9

7.3Net Efficiency13.1

-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.9

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

73.9Tempo66.2

55.3%Effective FG%52.2%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.1%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

45.3%Free Throw Rate32.0%

5.4Average Margin8.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–53.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–112.5), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.2), net efficiency (13.1–7.3).

William & Mary COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-2.9), shooting efficiency (55.3–52.2), free throw rate (45.3–32.0).

Final

William & Mary

61—92

Hofstra

Hofstra by 31 • 65.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATHofstra

16-46FG28-62

35.0%FG%45.0%

5-223PT14-36

23.0%3PT%39.0%

24-34FT22-30

71.0%FT%73.0%

32Rebounds41

9Offensive Rebounds16

8Assists12

12Turnovers6

2Steals6

4Blocks—

22Fouls25

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jo'el Emanuel	F	21	3-6	1-2	9-11	8	0	0	2	16
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	27	3-8	2-4	4-9	2	0	1	1	12
Chase Lowe	G	25	3-4	0-0	2-3	1	2	0	0	8
Kilian Brockhoff	F	19	2-3	0-1	4-4	0	1	0	0	8
Reese Miller	G	13	2-6	1-4	2-2	3	0	0	0	7
Finn Lally	F	15	1-3	0-2	3-4	6	2	0	0	5
Jhei-R Jones	G	21	1-6	1-4	0-1	2	1	0	0	3
Kyle Pulliam	G	21	1-5	0-2	0-0	1	1	1	0	2
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	19	0-2	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	1	0
Cade Haskins	F	15	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Colin Ndaw	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Kyle Frazier	G	2	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Cruz Davis	G	30	9-15	5-9	7-8	1	5	2	30
German Plotnikov	G	22	6-10	5-9	0-0	5	0	2	17
Preston Edmead	G	30	2-12	1-6	8-9	1	2	0	13
Biggie Patterson	G	24	3-7	1-4	3-4	12	2	0	10
Silas Sunday	F	26	3-3	0-0	1-2	12	2	1	7
Joshua Aaron Reaves	G	22	2-7	2-6	0-0	1	0	0	6
Joshua DeCady	F	27	2-2	0-0	0-3	3	1	0	4
A.J. Wills	G	6	1-3	0-1	2-2	0	0	1	4
Victory Onuetu	F	6	0-2	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	1
Alex Tsynkevich	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Jaeden Roberts	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.8Possessions65.8

92.7Offensive Efficiency139.8

139.8Defensive Efficiency92.7

-47.1Net Efficiency47.1

40.2%Effective FG%56.5%

49.1%True Shooting %60.3%

18.4%Turnover Rate9.1%

73.9%Free Throw Rate48.4%

47.8%3-Point Rate58.1%

0.67Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 65.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.