Monmouth logo

Monmouth

19-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.4%Monmouth
78.6%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -9.5
PROJECTED TOTAL143.2
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -367
Hofstra logo

Hofstra

24-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMonmouth 67
Projected Total143.2
Projected ScoreHofstra 76

Team Comparison

52.2MMH Power Index59.3
106.4Offensive Efficiency114.0
103.8Defensive Efficiency100.9
2.6Net Efficiency13.1
0.4Strength of Schedule-2.9
7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
68.3Tempo66.2
49.9%Effective FG%52.2%
16.6%Turnover Rate16.1%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
33.6%Free Throw Rate32.0%
1.8Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–52.2), offensive efficiency (114.0–106.4), defensive efficiency (100.9–103.8), net efficiency (13.1–2.6).
Monmouth COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.4–-2.9), free throw rate (33.6–32.0).
Final
Monmouth logo
Monmouth
6975
Hofstra logo
Hofstra
Hofstra by 666.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MonmouthTEAM STATHofstra
24-55FG23-58
44.0%FG%40.0%
7-233PT6-22
30.0%3PT%27.0%
14-20FT23-28
70.0%FT%82.0%
31Rebounds43
8Offensive Rebounds15
11Assists10
9Turnovers11
7Steals7
2Blocks1
19Fouls20

Player Box Score

Monmouth
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kavion McClainF376-124-83-316100019
Stefanos SpartalisF345-90-16-6111110016
Jason Rivera-TorresF346-140-54-760200016
Justin RayG214-93-50-001200011
Andrew BallG242-40-11-45000005
Dok MuordarC51-30-00-02000002
Jack CollinsG400-30-30-01311000
Cornelius Robinson IIIF50-10-00-01000000
Hofstra
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Preston EdmeadG408-172-68-944200026
Cruz DavisG313-131-55-645100012
German PlotnikovG363-92-62-330000010
Silas SundayF253-50-02-312011008
Victory OnuetuF123-40-02-36010008
Biggie PattersonG182-40-22-27020006
Joshua Aaron ReavesG81-31-30-01000003
Joshua DeCadyF300-30-02-25100002

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4
103.9Offensive Efficiency113.0
113.0Defensive Efficiency103.9
-9.0Net Efficiency9.0
50.0%Effective FG%44.8%
53.5%True Shooting %52.6%
13.7%Turnover Rate16.3%
36.4%Free Throw Rate48.3%
41.8%3-Point Rate37.9%
1.22Assist / Turnover0.91
Game Summary
Hofstra won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.