Texas logo

Texas

21-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.5%Texas
58.5%NC State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNC State -3.6
PROJECTED TOTAL163.4
MODEL MONEYLINENC State -141
NC State logo

NC State

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas 80
Projected Total163.4
Projected ScoreNC State 84

Team Comparison

61.6MMH Power Index60.1
119.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
110.1Defensive Efficiency108.6
9.5Net Efficiency9.8
5.3Strength of Schedule6.4
-5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.9
69.2Tempo70.2
55.1%Effective FG%55.1%
15.5%Turnover Rate13.1%
35.9%Offensive Rebound %28.2%
44.3%Free Throw Rate35.7%
6.6Average Margin6.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

EVEN MATCHUP

WIN PROBABILITY58.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
5–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNo clear statistical separation
Final
Texas logo
Texas
68—66
NC State logo
NC State
Texas by 2 • 67.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TexasTEAM STATNC State
21-57FG23-59
37.0%FG%39.0%
5-173PT6-16
29.0%3PT%38.0%
21-29FT14-18
72.0%FT%78.0%
45Rebounds33
15Offensive Rebounds7
10Assists10
12Turnovers7
7Steals8
5Blocks5
16Fouls22

Player Box Score

Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tramon MarkG337-142-51-252220017
Matas VokietaitisC264-110-07-1280010015
Dailyn SwainG382-91-38-984210013
Chendall WeaverG273-50-05-6101200011
Jordan PopeG372-81-50-01210005
Camden HeideF141-21-20-02101003
Nic CodieF141-40-00-03000002
Simeon WilcherG111-40-20-01000002
NC State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Darrion WilliamsF398-183-62-231010021
Quadir CopelandG357-160-02-383400016
Paul McNeil Jr.G324-113-80-010000011
Tre HollomanG251-40-26-72421008
Ven-Allen LubinF232-60-02-25100006
Matt AbleG251-30-02-43021004
Musa SagniaF100-00-00-02002000
Terrance ArceneauxG70-10-00-00100000
Scottie EbubeC40-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.7Possessions67.7
100.4Offensive Efficiency97.5
97.5Defensive Efficiency100.4
3.0Net Efficiency-3.0
41.2%Effective FG%44.1%
48.0%True Shooting %48.9%
17.7%Turnover Rate10.4%
50.9%Free Throw Rate30.5%
29.8%3-Point Rate27.1%
0.83Assist / Turnover1.43
Game Summary
Texas won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 67.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.