Miami (OH) logo

Miami (OH)

32-2
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.0%Miami (OH)
67.0%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -3.8
PROJECTED TOTAL168.9
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -203
SMU logo

SMU

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 83
Projected Total168.9
Projected ScoreSMU 86

Team Comparison

60.7MMH Power Index62.5
123.1Offensive Efficiency118.2
103.7Defensive Efficiency109.6
19.4Net Efficiency8.6
-5.6Strength of Schedule7.0
5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
72.8Tempo71.1
60.6%Effective FG%55.7%
14.2%Turnover Rate15.7%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
40.1%Free Throw Rate31.3%
14.1Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
83
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (123.1–118.2), defensive efficiency (103.7–109.6), net efficiency (19.4–8.6), recent form (5.5–-1.3).
SMU COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (62.5–60.7), strength of schedule (7.0–-5.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–26.3).
Final
Miami (OH) logo
Miami (OH)
8979
SMU logo
SMU
Miami (OH) by 1066.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATSMU
29-64FG31-65
45.0%FG%48.0%
16-413PT5-21
39.0%3PT%24.0%
15-22FT12-15
68.0%FT%80.0%
35Rebounds35
12Offensive Rebounds12
20Assists15
4Turnovers6
4Steals4
2Blocks
17Fouls18

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Eian ElmerG248-116-91-231100023
Brant ByersG365-114-95-741010019
Luke SkaljacG307-123-50-034300017
Almar AtlasonF244-102-72-253010012
Justin KirbyG212-41-33-42100008
Peter SuderG362-90-43-57600007
Antwone WoolfolkF191-50-31-24200003
Trey PerryG100-20-10-04200000
SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaden ToombsC358-100-04-4111100020
Jaron Pierre Jr.G398-161-71-144300018
Boopie MillerG396-173-60-115000015
Corey WashingtonF363-80-37-953000013
Samet YigitogluC274-50-00-06000008
Sam WaltersF172-61-40-04200005
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.F40-30-10-00000000
B.J. Davis-RayG20-00-00-00000000
Mitchell HolmesF10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.3Possessions66.3
134.2Offensive Efficiency119.2
119.2Defensive Efficiency134.2
15.1Net Efficiency-15.1
57.8%Effective FG%51.5%
59.8%True Shooting %54.8%
6.0%Turnover Rate9.1%
34.4%Free Throw Rate23.1%
64.1%3-Point Rate32.3%
5.00Assist / Turnover2.50
Game Summary
Miami (OH) won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 66.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.