Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.7%Texas A&M

87.3%Saint Mary's

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSaint Mary's -12.8

PROJECTED TOTAL150.1

MODEL MONEYLINESaint Mary's -687

Saint Mary's

27-6

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 69

Projected Total150.1

Projected ScoreSaint Mary's 81

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricSaint Mary's

58MMH Power Index70.7

116.1Offensive Efficiency116.7

108.4Defensive Efficiency97.4

7.7Net Efficiency19.3

4.8Strength of Schedule3.0

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency18.6

69.1Tempo66.3

53.5%Effective FG%53.1%

14.8%Turnover Rate16.6%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %37.4%

37.5%Free Throw Rate36.8%

5.3Average Margin12.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Saint Mary's HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSaint Mary's holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (70.7–58.0), offensive efficiency (116.7–116.1), defensive efficiency (97.4–108.4), net efficiency (19.3–7.7).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.8–3.0), shooting efficiency (53.5–53.1), ball security (14.8–16.6).

Final

Texas A&M

63—50

Saint Mary's

Texas A&M by 13 • 59.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATSaint Mary's

23-52FG18-47

44.0%FG%38.0%

8-233PT10-23

35.0%3PT%43.0%

9-13FT4-11

69.0%FT%36.0%

31Rebounds32

9Offensive Rebounds11

15Assists8

10Turnovers18

12Steals5

1Blocks3

16Fouls10

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	31	7-11	3-5	5-6	9	3	1	0	22
Rubén Dominguez	G	25	4-8	3-7	0-0	1	1	1	0	11
Ali Dibba	G	24	4-9	0-2	1-2	7	1	3	0	9
Jamie Vinson	F	9	2-2	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	5
Rylan Griffen	G	24	2-7	0-3	0-1	2	0	1	0	4
Marcus Hill	G	19	1-4	0-0	2-2	3	1	0	0	4
Pop Isaacs	G	23	1-4	1-2	0-0	0	3	2	0	3
Zach Clemence	F	21	1-3	1-3	0-0	5	3	2	1	3
Jacari Lane	G	12	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	1	1	0	2
Josh Holloway	G	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	1	0	0

Saint Mary's

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joshua Dent	G	36	7-14	4-9	0-0	4	4	1	0	18
Liam Campbell	G	28	5-7	3-3	2-4	5	0	0	0	15
Dillan Shaw	G	35	3-7	2-5	0-1	6	0	2	0	8
Mikey Lewis	G	22	2-8	1-5	0-0	0	0	0	1	5
Paulius Murauskas	F	23	1-6	0-1	2-2	3	0	0	1	4
Andrew McKeever	C	29	0-3	0-0	0-4	8	4	1	1	0
Harry Wessels	C	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Rory Hawke	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Mantas Juzenas	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Tony Duckett	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Oliver Faubert	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

59.2Possessions59.2

106.4Offensive Efficiency84.5

84.5Defensive Efficiency106.4

22.0Net Efficiency-22.0

51.9%Effective FG%48.9%

54.1%True Shooting %47.9%

16.9%Turnover Rate30.4%

25.0%Free Throw Rate23.4%

44.2%3-Point Rate48.9%

1.50Assist / Turnover0.44

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 59.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.