
McNeese
27-6GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.0%McNeese
68.0%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -5.6
PROJECTED TOTAL153.7
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -212

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMcNeese 74
Projected Total153.7
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 80
Team Comparison
66.7MMH Power Index68.9
117.4Offensive Efficiency120.9
98.3Defensive Efficiency105.7
19.1Net Efficiency15.2
-1.6Strength of Schedule7.4
15.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
66.0Tempo70.9
52.2%Effective FG%55.3%
13.9%Turnover Rate13.5%
37.1%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
37.7%Free Throw Rate39.3%
12.6Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–66.7), offensive efficiency (120.9–117.4), strength of schedule (7.4–-1.6), shooting efficiency (55.3–52.2).
McNeese COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–105.7), net efficiency (19.1–15.2), recent form (15.5–2.7).