TCU logo

TCU

23-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.0%TCU
74.0%Ohio State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOhio State -6.8
PROJECTED TOTAL153.0
MODEL MONEYLINEOhio State -285
Ohio State logo

Ohio State

21-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTCU 73
Projected Total153.0
Projected ScoreOhio State 80

Team Comparison

59.7MMH Power Index64.5
110.2Offensive Efficiency118.1
102.7Defensive Efficiency108.1
7.5Net Efficiency10.0
4.6Strength of Schedule6.4
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency6.3
70.2Tempo67.2
50.5%Effective FG%56.9%
15.3%Turnover Rate15.3%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
38.3%Free Throw Rate38.3%
5.3Average Margin6.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Ohio State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
72
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOhio State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–59.7), offensive efficiency (118.1–110.2), net efficiency (10.0–7.5), strength of schedule (6.4–4.6).
TCU COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–108.1), offensive rebounding (33.6–30.7).
Final
TCU logo
TCU
6664
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
TCU by 262.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TCUTEAM STATOhio State
24-60FG24-57
40.0%FG%42.0%
9-233PT6-23
39.0%3PT%26.0%
9-14FT10-11
64.0%FT%91.0%
38Rebounds32
12Offensive Rebounds6
12Assists18
7Turnovers7
4Steals4
4Blocks3
13Fouls10

Player Box Score

TCU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Micah RobinsonF376-114-62-250100018
David PunchF286-120-14-6132030016
Xavier EdmondsF256-122-32-483100016
Brock HardingG293-82-60-04300008
Jayden PierreG361-71-31-20201004
Liutauras LeleviciusG282-80-30-05110004
Tanner ToolsonG160-20-10-03110000
Vianney SalatchoumC10-00-00-00000000
Ohio State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John Mobley Jr.G396-173-110-036000015
Devin RoyalF395-100-14-450000014
Amare BynumF355-80-32-392120012
Bruce ThorntonG403-92-52-244100010
Christoph TillyC314-90-12-266210010
Gabe CuppsG51-21-20-00000003
Taison ChatmanG50-20-00-01000000
Brandon NoelF40-00-00-00000000
Ivan NjegovanC20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.5Possessions62.5
105.6Offensive Efficiency102.4
102.4Defensive Efficiency105.6
3.2Net Efficiency-3.2
47.5%Effective FG%47.4%
49.5%True Shooting %51.4%
11.4%Turnover Rate11.1%
23.3%Free Throw Rate19.3%
38.3%3-Point Rate40.4%
1.71Assist / Turnover2.57
Game Summary
TCU won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 62.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.