Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.0%Miami (OH)

80.0%Tennessee

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTennessee -8.2

PROJECTED TOTAL160.3

MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -400

Tennessee

25-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 76

Projected Total160.3

Projected ScoreTennessee 84

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricTennessee

60.7MMH Power Index68.6

123.1Offensive Efficiency115.8

103.7Defensive Efficiency102.1

19.4Net Efficiency13.7

-5.6Strength of Schedule7.8

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

72.8Tempo68.1

60.6%Effective FG%51.6%

14.2%Turnover Rate17.3%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %44.5%

40.1%Free Throw Rate38.6%

14.1Average Margin9.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (123.1–115.8), net efficiency (19.4–13.7), recent form (5.5–3.3), shooting efficiency (60.6–51.6).

Tennessee COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (68.6–60.7), defensive efficiency (102.1–103.7), strength of schedule (7.8–-5.6).

Final

Miami (OH)

56—78

Tennessee

Tennessee by 22 • 65.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATTennessee

19-54FG31-59

35.0%FG%53.0%

7-293PT9-20

24.0%3PT%45.0%

11-14FT7-10

79.0%FT%70.0%

25Rebounds42

8Offensive Rebounds13

8Assists19

12Turnovers16

8Steals5

3Blocks2

14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Peter Suder	G	33	7-12	4-7	9-10	2	2	0	0	27
Brant Byers	G	38	3-12	1-6	2-2	6	0	1	1	9
Eian Elmer	G	30	2-10	0-7	0-0	5	1	2	0	4
Luke Skaljac	G	25	2-4	0-1	0-0	1	3	2	0	4
Trey Perry	G	17	2-6	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Antwone Woolfolk	F	27	1-2	1-2	0-2	3	1	2	2	3
Almar Atlason	F	15	1-4	1-4	0-0	2	1	1	0	3
Justin Kirby	G	15	1-4	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	2

Tennessee

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ja'Kobi Gillespie	G	36	11-21	6-11	1-1	3	9	3	0	29
J.P. Estrella	F	28	7-12	0-0	0-2	10	1	2	0	14
Felix Okpara	F	29	5-5	0-0	2-2	5	1	0	1	12
Ethan Burg	G	23	2-3	2-3	1-2	1	1	0	0	7
Amari Evans	G	27	3-7	0-2	0-0	5	2	0	0	6
Bishop Boswell	G	22	1-3	1-3	2-2	2	3	0	0	5
DeWayne Brown II	F	8	2-4	0-0	1-1	2	0	0	0	5
Nate Ament	F	18	0-3	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	1	0
Jaylen Carey	F	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Troy Henderson	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Clarence Massamba	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Amaree Abram	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.8Possessions65.8

85.1Offensive Efficiency118.5

118.5Defensive Efficiency85.1

-33.4Net Efficiency33.4

41.7%Effective FG%60.2%

46.2%True Shooting %61.2%

18.6%Turnover Rate24.0%

25.9%Free Throw Rate16.9%

53.7%3-Point Rate33.9%

0.67Assist / Turnover1.19

Game Summary

Tennessee won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 65.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.