
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.2%Hofstra
83.8%Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -10.1
PROJECTED TOTAL161.6
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -517

Alabama
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 76
Projected Total161.6
Projected ScoreAlabama 86
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index69.5
114.0Offensive Efficiency121.6
100.9Defensive Efficiency111.2
13.1Net Efficiency10.4
-2.9Strength of Schedule9.4
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5
66.2Tempo74.7
52.2%Effective FG%54.9%
16.1%Turnover Rate13.0%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
32.0%Free Throw Rate36.9%
8.7Average Margin7.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Alabama HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–59.3), offensive efficiency (121.6–114.0), strength of schedule (9.4–-2.9), shooting efficiency (54.9–52.2).
Hofstra COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.9–111.2), net efficiency (13.1–10.4), recent form (14.0–9.5).