Queens University

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.2%Queens University

94.8%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -19.0

PROJECTED TOTAL164.5

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1823

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQueens University 73

Projected Total164.5

Projected ScorePurdue 92

Team Comparison

Queens UniversityMetricPurdue

51.7MMH Power Index73.2

118.4Offensive Efficiency124.8

117.0Defensive Efficiency107.8

1.4Net Efficiency17.0

0.1Strength of Schedule7.6

1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

71.4Tempo65.4

56.6%Effective FG%57.8%

14.8%Turnover Rate13.7%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

37.6%Free Throw Rate29.1%

0.9Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–51.7), offensive efficiency (124.8–118.4), defensive efficiency (107.8–117.0), net efficiency (17.0–1.4).

Queens University COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (37.6–29.1).

Final

Queens University

71—104

Purdue

Purdue by 33 • 67.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATPurdue

30-65FG41-65

46.0%FG%63.0%

7-253PT14-24

28.0%3PT%58.0%

4-5FT8-12

80.0%FT%67.0%

19Rebounds41

8Offensive Rebounds15

20Assists24

8Turnovers12

10Steals5

3Blocks6

12Fouls13

Player Box Score

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nasir Mann	G	27	5-10	0-3	0-0	2	5	2	0	10
Jordan Watford	G	25	4-7	0-0	2-3	0	6	0	0	10
Maban Jabriel	F	21	4-9	1-4	0-0	5	0	2	2	9
Chris Ashby	G	33	3-6	2-5	0-0	1	2	1	0	8
Carson Schwieger	F	25	3-7	2-6	0-0	1	2	0	0	8
Avantae Parker	F	18	3-9	0-1	0-0	3	3	2	1	6
Gus Larson	F	12	3-4	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Yoav Berman	G	28	2-9	1-4	0-0	2	1	1	0	5
Isaiah Henry	G	5	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Kam Clark	F	3	1-2	0-1	2-2	0	0	1	0	4
Reid Celestin	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braden Smith	G	32	10-15	4-6	2-2	3	8	0	0	26
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	25	12-18	0-0	1-3	9	3	0	0	25
Fletcher Loyer	G	25	5-9	4-8	0-0	2	1	1	0	14
C.J. Cox	G	25	3-4	3-4	2-3	4	1	1	0	11
Oscar Cluff	C	22	3-6	0-0	3-4	11	5	1	4	9
Omer Mayer	G	17	4-6	1-1	0-0	1	3	1	0	9
Daniel Jacobsen	C	10	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	2	4
Jack Benter	G	20	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	2	1	0	3
Liam Murphy	F	5	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Gicarri Harris	G	19	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.6Possessions67.6

105.0Offensive Efficiency153.8

153.8Defensive Efficiency105.0

-48.8Net Efficiency48.8

51.5%Effective FG%73.8%

52.7%True Shooting %73.6%

11.9%Turnover Rate17.7%

7.7%Free Throw Rate18.5%

38.5%3-Point Rate36.9%

2.50Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Purdue won by 33 points. The game played at approximately 67.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.