Texas logo

Texas

21-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.4%Texas
89.6%Gonzaga
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGonzaga -15.4
PROJECTED TOTAL157.9
MODEL MONEYLINEGonzaga -862
Gonzaga logo

Gonzaga

31-4
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas 71
Projected Total157.9
Projected ScoreGonzaga 87

Team Comparison

61.6MMH Power Index76.4
119.6Offensive Efficiency119.7
110.1Defensive Efficiency94.0
9.5Net Efficiency25.7
5.3Strength of Schedule3.0
-5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency18.2
69.2Tempo70.4
55.1%Effective FG%55.7%
15.5%Turnover Rate13.6%
35.9%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
44.3%Free Throw Rate31.5%
6.6Average Margin18.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Gonzaga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
83
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGonzaga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.4–61.6), offensive efficiency (119.7–119.6), defensive efficiency (94.0–110.1), net efficiency (25.7–9.5).
Texas COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.3–3.0), offensive rebounding (35.9–35.0), free throw rate (44.3–31.5).
Final
Texas logo
Texas
7468
Gonzaga logo
Gonzaga
Texas by 664.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TexasTEAM STATGonzaga
31-60FG27-60
52.0%FG%45.0%
5-153PT4-16
33.0%3PT%25.0%
7-9FT10-12
78.0%FT%83.0%
29Rebounds34
5Offensive Rebounds9
20Assists21
5Turnovers7
4Steals5
2Blocks1
11Fouls9

Player Box Score

Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan PopeG327-183-80-013000017
Matas VokietaitisC317-110-03-592000017
Nic CodieF265-60-12-243110012
Dailyn SwainG385-71-10-066100011
Chendall WeaverG194-50-00-03111008
Tramon MarkG312-100-32-24200006
Camden HeideF131-21-20-00110003
Simeon WilcherG100-10-00-00200000
Gonzaga
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Graham IkeF3910-221-44-433100025
Jalen WarleyG294-70-02-485010010
Emmanuel InnocentiF394-61-30-06320009
Mario Saint-SuperyG313-81-62-22500009
Tyon Grant-FosterG192-51-12-23220007
Davis FogleG243-90-10-04200006
Adam MillerG91-30-10-01000002
Braeden SmithG90-00-00-02100000
Ismaila DiagneC10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.0Possessions64.0
115.6Offensive Efficiency106.3
106.3Defensive Efficiency115.6
9.4Net Efficiency-9.4
55.8%Effective FG%48.3%
57.6%True Shooting %51.8%
7.8%Turnover Rate11.0%
15.0%Free Throw Rate20.0%
25.0%3-Point Rate26.7%
4.00Assist / Turnover3.00
Game Summary
Texas won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 64.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.