Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.6%Vanderbilt

57.4%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -2.9

PROJECTED TOTAL154.2

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -135

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 76

Projected Total154.2

Projected ScoreNebraska 79

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricNebraska

68.9MMH Power Index67

120.9Offensive Efficiency114.4

105.7Defensive Efficiency98.3

15.2Net Efficiency16.1

7.4Strength of Schedule6.1

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

70.9Tempo67.3

55.3%Effective FG%55.6%

13.5%Turnover Rate14.4%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

39.3%Free Throw Rate26.9%

10.8Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–67.0), offensive efficiency (120.9–114.4), strength of schedule (7.4–6.1), ball security (13.5–14.4).

Nebraska COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–105.7), net efficiency (16.1–15.2), recent form (6.8–2.7).

Final

Vanderbilt

72—74

Nebraska

Nebraska by 2 • 63.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATNebraska

24-58FG29-52

41.0%FG%56.0%

13-373PT9-19

35.0%3PT%47.0%

11-19FT7-10

58.0%FT%70.0%

30Rebounds31

11Offensive Rebounds5

15Assists17

8Turnovers12

6Steals5

4Blocks—

16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	38	9-21	3-10	6-9	2	4	4	0	27
Tyler Nickel	F	33	5-13	5-12	1-2	5	1	1	0	16
AK Okereke	F	32	3-7	3-5	0-0	7	1	0	2	9
Duke Miles	G	32	2-10	1-8	4-4	0	6	1	0	9
Jalen Washington	C	14	3-3	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	1	6
Devin McGlockton	F	29	1-2	1-2	0-4	8	0	0	0	3
Chandler Bing	G	22	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	3	0	1	2

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Pryce Sandfort	F	37	5-9	3-6	2-3	5	2	1	15
Braden Frager	F	28	6-11	1-3	2-3	5	1	1	15
Rienk Mast	F	34	5-10	3-6	0-0	5	4	0	13
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	27	5-6	2-2	0-1	4	1	0	12
Jamarques Lawrence	G	20	4-6	0-1	1-1	1	1	2	9
Sam Hoiberg	G	38	3-6	0-0	2-2	4	8	1	8
Leo Curtis	F	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Cale Jacobsen	G	14	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9

112.7Offensive Efficiency115.8

115.8Defensive Efficiency112.7

-3.1Net Efficiency3.1

52.6%Effective FG%64.4%

53.7%True Shooting %65.2%

12.5%Turnover Rate18.8%

32.8%Free Throw Rate19.2%

63.8%3-Point Rate36.5%

1.88Assist / Turnover1.42

Game Summary

Nebraska won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.