Miami

26-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.3%Miami

79.7%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -8.3

PROJECTED TOTAL155.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -393

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami 73

Projected Total155.2

Projected ScorePurdue 82

Team Comparison

MiamiMetricPurdue

65.5MMH Power Index73.2

117.8Offensive Efficiency124.8

103.0Defensive Efficiency107.8

14.8Net Efficiency17.0

3.6Strength of Schedule7.6

3.6Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.2Tempo65.4

55.5%Effective FG%57.8%

16.2%Turnover Rate13.7%

37.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

37.9%Free Throw Rate29.1%

10.3Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–65.5), offensive efficiency (124.8–117.8), net efficiency (17.0–14.8), strength of schedule (7.6–3.6).

Miami COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.0–107.8), offensive rebounding (37.3–36.2), free throw rate (37.9–29.1).

Final

Miami

69—79

Purdue

Purdue by 10 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MiamiTEAM STATPurdue

28-63FG25-47

44.0%FG%53.0%

5-193PT8-14

26.0%3PT%57.0%

8-10FT21-22

80.0%FT%95.0%

33Rebounds25

14Offensive Rebounds4

17Assists17

12Turnovers12

9Steals8

2Blocks3

16Fouls9

Player Box Score

Miami

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Shelton Henderson	F	40	9-11	0-1	0-0	8	4	2	0	18
Malik Reneau	F	36	6-15	0-3	4-4	5	3	4	1	16
Tre Donaldson	G	36	4-15	2-6	3-4	4	3	0	0	13
Tru Washington	G	28	5-13	1-5	0-0	5	4	1	0	11
Dante Allen	G	24	3-7	2-4	0-0	1	3	1	0	8
Ernest Udeh Jr.	C	33	1-2	0-0	1-2	7	0	1	1	3
Timotej Malovec	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Fletcher Loyer	G	35	6-7	4-4	8-8	1	2	1	0	24
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	35	8-16	0-0	3-3	9	2	1	0	19
Braden Smith	G	38	3-12	0-4	6-6	2	8	1	0	12
C.J. Cox	G	18	4-5	3-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	11
Oscar Cluff	C	32	3-4	0-0	2-3	7	2	3	2	8
Gicarri Harris	G	18	1-1	1-1	2-2	1	1	2	1	5
Omer Mayer	G	11	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jack Benter	G	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Daniel Jacobsen	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

105.0Offensive Efficiency120.2

120.2Defensive Efficiency105.0

-15.2Net Efficiency15.2

48.4%Effective FG%61.7%

50.9%True Shooting %68.8%

18.3%Turnover Rate18.3%

15.9%Free Throw Rate46.8%

30.2%3-Point Rate29.8%

1.42Assist / Turnover1.42

Game Summary

Purdue won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.