Texas

21-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.2%Texas

85.8%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -11.4

PROJECTED TOTAL158.9

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -604

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas 74

Projected Total158.9

Projected ScorePurdue 85

Team Comparison

TexasMetricPurdue

61.6MMH Power Index73.2

119.6Offensive Efficiency124.8

110.1Defensive Efficiency107.8

9.5Net Efficiency17.0

5.3Strength of Schedule7.6

-5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.2Tempo65.4

55.1%Effective FG%57.8%

15.5%Turnover Rate13.7%

35.9%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

44.3%Free Throw Rate29.1%

6.6Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–61.6), offensive efficiency (124.8–119.6), defensive efficiency (107.8–110.1), net efficiency (17.0–9.5).

Texas COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (44.3–29.1).

Final

Texas

77—79

Purdue

Purdue by 2 • 60.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TexasTEAM STATPurdue

29-56FG30-62

52.0%FG%48.0%

11-253PT4-20

44.0%3PT%20.0%

8-15FT15-20

53.0%FT%75.0%

31Rebounds32

12Offensive Rebounds12

10Assists12

7Turnovers4

2Steals3

1Blocks—

18Fouls14

Player Box Score

Texas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tramon Mark	G	34	11-15	5-7	2-4	3	0	1	0	29
Dailyn Swain	G	39	6-13	0-2	3-5	9	5	0	0	15
Jordan Pope	G	33	4-10	4-9	0-0	2	1	0	0	12
Matas Vokietaitis	C	23	3-5	0-0	3-6	2	0	0	1	9
Nic Codie	F	27	2-2	1-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	5
Chendall Weaver	G	10	2-5	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Camden Heide	F	24	1-4	1-4	0-0	5	1	0	0	3
Simeon Wilcher	G	10	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	36	8-10	0-0	4-4	8	0	0	20
Fletcher Loyer	G	33	6-13	4-8	2-2	3	3	0	18
Braden Smith	G	37	6-16	0-3	4-6	2	5	2	16
Oscar Cluff	C	29	4-7	0-0	3-4	6	2	0	11
C.J. Cox	G	31	4-9	0-4	2-2	8	2	0	10
Omer Mayer	G	10	1-5	0-4	0-2	3	0	0	2
Gicarri Harris	G	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Jack Benter	G	13	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0
Daniel Jacobsen	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.8Possessions60.8

126.6Offensive Efficiency129.9

129.9Defensive Efficiency126.6

-3.3Net Efficiency3.3

61.6%Effective FG%51.6%

61.0%True Shooting %55.2%

12.0%Turnover Rate6.3%

26.8%Free Throw Rate32.3%

44.6%3-Point Rate32.3%

1.43Assist / Turnover3.00

Game Summary

Purdue won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 60.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.