Alabama logo

Alabama

24-10
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.4%Alabama
85.6%Michigan
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMichigan -13.3
PROJECTED TOTAL171.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMichigan -594
Michigan logo

Michigan

36-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama 79
Projected Total171.4
Projected ScoreMichigan 92

Team Comparison

69.5MMH Power Index80.9
121.6Offensive Efficiency122.3
111.2Defensive Efficiency97.0
10.4Net Efficiency25.3
9.4Strength of Schedule8.7
9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency17.2
74.7Tempo71.8
54.9%Effective FG%58.8%
13.0%Turnover Rate16.4%
32.1%Offensive Rebound %34.6%
36.9%Free Throw Rate38.9%
7.7Average Margin18.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Michigan HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMichigan holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (80.9–69.5), offensive efficiency (122.3–121.6), defensive efficiency (97.0–111.2), net efficiency (25.3–10.4).
Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (9.4–8.7), ball security (13.0–16.4).
Final
Alabama logo
Alabama
7790
Michigan logo
Michigan
Michigan by 1371.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AlabamaTEAM STATMichigan
25-69FG33-66
36.0%FG%50.0%
14-473PT13-27
30.0%3PT%48.0%
13-14FT11-20
93.0%FT%55.0%
32Rebounds46
11Offensive Rebounds13
14Assists22
7Turnovers8
5Steals4
1Blocks8
19Fouls12

Player Box Score

Alabama
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Labaron Philon Jr.G3910-216-149-974100035
Latrell WrightsellG375-153-122-311200015
Aiden SherrellF314-112-50-043210010
London JemisonF233-61-30-03000007
Amari AllenF221-60-42-26300004
Houston MalletteG251-61-50-04300003
Taylor Bol BowenF191-31-30-02000003
Noah WilliamsonC30-10-10-01000000
Jalil BetheaG10-00-00-00000000
Michigan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF348-124-53-4127200023
Elliot CadeauG346-143-82-557110017
Trey McKenneyG285-73-54-610100017
Roddy Gayle Jr.G276-103-41-130020016
Aday MaraC274-80-00-05402008
Morez Johnson Jr.F243-100-11-48302007
Nimari BurnettG171-50-40-05001002
Will TschetterF90-00-00-01100000

Advanced Game Stats

71.1Possessions71.1
108.3Offensive Efficiency126.6
126.6Defensive Efficiency108.3
-18.3Net Efficiency18.3
46.4%Effective FG%59.8%
50.9%True Shooting %59.6%
9.8%Turnover Rate11.3%
20.3%Free Throw Rate30.3%
68.1%3-Point Rate40.9%
2.00Assist / Turnover2.75
Game Summary
Michigan won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 71.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.