Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.0%Texas A&M

90.0%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -13.9

PROJECTED TOTAL156.6

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -900

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 71

Projected Total156.6

Projected ScorePurdue 85

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricPurdue

58MMH Power Index73.2

116.1Offensive Efficiency124.8

108.4Defensive Efficiency107.8

7.7Net Efficiency17.0

4.8Strength of Schedule7.6

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.1Tempo65.4

53.5%Effective FG%57.8%

14.8%Turnover Rate13.7%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

37.5%Free Throw Rate29.1%

5.3Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–58.0), offensive efficiency (124.8–116.1), defensive efficiency (107.8–108.4), net efficiency (17.0–7.7).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (37.5–29.1).

Final

Texas A&M

70—66

Purdue

Texas A&M by 4 • 65.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATPurdue

22-50FG24-53

44.0%FG%45.0%

9-223PT9-26

41.0%3PT%35.0%

17-24FT9-10

71.0%FT%90.0%

34Rebounds23

14Offensive Rebounds8

14Assists16

18Turnovers16

11Steals11

4Blocks3

11Fouls20

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zhuric Phelps	Guard	29	4-9	2-4	6-7	3	4	2	0	16
Pharrel Payne	F	24	6-6	0-0	4-7	9	1	0	2	16
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	32	6-15	3-7	0-0	3	5	5	0	15
Hayden Hefner	Guard	13	2-4	2-4	0-0	1	0	1	0	6
Andersson Garcia	Forward	22	2-3	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Manny Obaseki	Guard	16	0-4	0-1	5-6	0	2	0	0	5
Henry Coleman III	Forward	12	1-2	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	3
CJ Wilcher	Guard	10	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Solomon Washington	F	22	0-1	0-0	1-2	4	0	2	1	1
Jace Carter	Not Available	20	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	1	1	1	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braden Smith	G	38	5-14	5-11	0-0	6	6	4	2	15
Fletcher Loyer	G	38	5-8	0-2	2-2	0	3	1	0	12
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	36	3-9	0-0	5-6	4	2	2	0	11
C.J. Cox	G	17	4-6	2-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	10
Camden Heide	F	25	4-6	1-3	0-0	4	0	1	0	9
Myles Colvin	G	22	3-8	1-6	2-2	2	4	1	0	9
Will Berg	C	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	1	0
Caleb Furst	Forward	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Gicarri Harris	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6

106.7Offensive Efficiency100.6

100.6Defensive Efficiency106.7

6.1Net Efficiency-6.1

53.0%Effective FG%53.8%

57.0%True Shooting %57.1%

27.5%Turnover Rate24.3%

48.0%Free Throw Rate18.9%

44.0%3-Point Rate49.1%

0.78Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.