
Stephen F. Austin
28-6GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.3%Stephen F. Austin
73.7%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL153.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -280

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStephen F. Austin 73
Projected Total153.0
Projected ScoreTulsa 80
Team Comparison
60.1MMH Power Index64.8
114.3Offensive Efficiency121.1
99.4Defensive Efficiency104.8
14.9Net Efficiency16.3
-1.8Strength of Schedule0.0
4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
67.0Tempo70.2
52.2%Effective FG%55.4%
13.9%Turnover Rate15.4%
34.3%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
30.3%Free Throw Rate42.4%
10.0Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–60.1), offensive efficiency (121.1–114.3), net efficiency (16.3–14.9), strength of schedule (0.0–-1.8).
Stephen F. Austin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.4–104.8), ball security (13.9–15.4), offensive rebounding (34.3–33.8).