
George Washington
19-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.4%George Washington
60.6%Utah Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -4.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -154

Utah Valley
25-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGeorge Washington 75
Projected Total154.7
Projected ScoreUtah Valley 80
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index59.1
115.4Offensive Efficiency113.4
105.2Defensive Efficiency97.3
10.2Net Efficiency16.1
3.1Strength of Schedule-3.3
0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8
70.5Tempo70.6
55.0%Effective FG%56.0%
18.2%Turnover Rate19.9%
35.8%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
35.6%Free Throw Rate37.3%
7.2Average Margin11.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (97.3–105.2), net efficiency (16.1–10.2), recent form (6.8–0.9), shooting efficiency (56.0–55.0).
George Washington COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (59.8–59.1), offensive efficiency (115.4–113.4), strength of schedule (3.1–-3.3).