UNLV logo

UNLV

18-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.6%UNLV
86.4%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -13.4
PROJECTED TOTAL162.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -635
Tulsa logo

Tulsa

30-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 74
Projected Total162.0
Projected ScoreTulsa 88

Team Comparison

UNLVMetricTulsa
52.8MMH Power Index64.8
111.0Offensive Efficiency121.1
109.6Defensive Efficiency104.8
1.4Net Efficiency16.3
2.7Strength of Schedule0.0
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
71.4Tempo70.2
53.7%Effective FG%55.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.4%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
41.6%Free Throw Rate42.4%
1.0Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–52.8), offensive efficiency (121.1–111.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.6), net efficiency (16.3–1.4).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.0).
Final
UNLV logo
UNLV
6677
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
Tulsa by 1165.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UNLVTEAM STATTulsa
27-59FG27-58
46.0%FG%47.0%
6-263PT10-28
23.0%3PT%36.0%
6-13FT13-22
46.0%FT%59.0%
23Rebounds49
6Offensive Rebounds18
11Assists16
7Turnovers15
9Steals4
4Blocks
18Fouls12

Player Box Score

UNLV
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dra Gibbs-LawhornG3912-243-102-421100029
Tyrin JonesF407-90-14-787330018
Issac WilliamsonG374-82-50-012010010
Kimani HamiltonF384-121-60-26040009
Walter BrownF360-30-30-02110000
Emmanuel StephenC40-10-00-01000000
Naas CunninghamF30-10-00-00000000
Al GreenG30-10-10-00000000
Tulsa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Miles BarnstableG306-143-101-241000016
Ade PopoolaG284-94-84-630100016
Romad DeanF285-91-40-0112100011
Myles RigsbyG234-50-02-251000010
Tylen RileyG292-80-15-62600009
Tyler BehrendF252-50-11-38310005
Jaylen LawalG142-41-30-07100005
KJ Martin Jr.F81-11-10-02110003
Ian SmikleF151-30-00-33100002

Advanced Game Stats

65.9Possessions65.9
100.2Offensive Efficiency116.8
116.8Defensive Efficiency100.2
-16.7Net Efficiency16.7
50.8%Effective FG%55.2%
50.6%True Shooting %56.2%
10.6%Turnover Rate22.9%
22.0%Free Throw Rate37.9%
44.1%3-Point Rate48.3%
1.57Assist / Turnover1.07
Game Summary
Tulsa won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 65.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.