
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.6%UNLV
86.4%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -13.4
PROJECTED TOTAL162.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -635

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 74
Projected Total162.0
Projected ScoreTulsa 88
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index64.8
111.0Offensive Efficiency121.1
109.6Defensive Efficiency104.8
1.4Net Efficiency16.3
2.7Strength of Schedule0.0
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
71.4Tempo70.2
53.7%Effective FG%55.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.4%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
41.6%Free Throw Rate42.4%
1.0Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–52.8), offensive efficiency (121.1–111.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.6), net efficiency (16.3–1.4).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.0).