
Rutgers
13-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.3%Rutgers
73.7%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCreighton -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL149.8
MODEL MONEYLINECreighton -280

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRutgers 71
Projected Total149.8
Projected ScoreCreighton 79
Team Comparison
45.9MMH Power Index50.6
104.2Offensive Efficiency109.0
112.2Defensive Efficiency109.5
-8.0Net Efficiency-0.5
3.9Strength of Schedule5.1
-1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
67.4Tempo68.9
47.4%Effective FG%53.0%
15.0%Turnover Rate16.6%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
36.3%Free Throw Rate29.0%
-5.4Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Creighton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCreighton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.6–45.9), offensive efficiency (109.0–104.2), defensive efficiency (109.5–112.2), net efficiency (-0.5–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-1.6–-5.2), ball security (15.0–16.6), offensive rebounding (29.2–26.6).