
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.6%Tulsa
61.4%Auburn
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAuburn -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL164.7
MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -159

Auburn
21-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 81
Projected Total164.7
Projected ScoreAuburn 83
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index64.4
121.1Offensive Efficiency118.8
104.8Defensive Efficiency113.0
16.3Net Efficiency5.8
0.0Strength of Schedule7.5
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
70.2Tempo69.8
55.4%Effective FG%53.1%
15.4%Turnover Rate14.5%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %36.5%
42.4%Free Throw Rate43.8%
11.5Average Margin4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–64.4), offensive efficiency (121.1–118.8), defensive efficiency (104.8–113.0), net efficiency (16.3–5.8).
Auburn COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.5–0.0), ball security (14.5–15.4), offensive rebounding (36.5–33.8).