
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.4%UNLV
78.6%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -9.4
PROJECTED TOTAL152.5
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -367

Dayton
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 72
Projected Total152.5
Projected ScoreDayton 81
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index59.9
111.0Offensive Efficiency108.5
109.6Defensive Efficiency101.5
1.4Net Efficiency7.0
2.7Strength of Schedule5.7
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
71.4Tempo68.3
53.7%Effective FG%52.0%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
41.6%Free Throw Rate47.6%
1.0Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–52.8), defensive efficiency (101.5–109.6), net efficiency (7.0–1.4), strength of schedule (5.7–2.7).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.0–108.5), shooting efficiency (53.7–52.0), offensive rebounding (30.8–26.7).