UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

51.8%UT Rio Grande Valley

48.2%Creighton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL149.5

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -107

Creighton

15-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 75

Projected Total149.5

Projected ScoreCreighton 75

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricCreighton

55.8MMH Power Index50.6

112.6Offensive Efficiency109.0

103.1Defensive Efficiency109.5

9.5Net Efficiency-0.5

-1.9Strength of Schedule5.1

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2

67.4Tempo68.9

55.7%Effective FG%53.0%

17.9%Turnover Rate16.6%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %26.6%

29.6%Free Throw Rate29.0%

6.4Average Margin-0.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–50.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–109.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–109.5), net efficiency (9.5–-0.5).

Creighton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–-1.9), ball security (16.6–17.9).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

86—99

Creighton

Creighton by 13 • 76.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATCreighton

33-77FG33-55

43.0%FG%60.0%

14-353PT7-23

40.0%3PT%30.0%

6-10FT26-29

60.0%FT%90.0%

33Rebounds38

15Offensive Rebounds7

13Assists20

10Turnovers15

12Steals2

1Blocks3

20Fouls11

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	31	11-24	2-6	2-5	11	4	4	0	26
DK Thorn	Guard	38	7-15	3-6	0-0	2	0	3	0	17
Cliff Davis	G	36	6-17	4-12	1-1	4	2	2	0	17
Trey Miller	G	34	3-7	0-0	3-4	6	3	1	0	9
Marshal Destremau	F	19	3-6	3-4	0-0	2	0	1	0	9
Tommy Gankhuyag	Forward	13	2-5	2-5	0-0	1	2	1	1	6
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	21	1-3	0-2	0-0	6	2	0	0	2
Kwo Agwa	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
RJ Nance	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jaylen Washington	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Creighton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ryan Kalkbrenner	Center	36	20-22	2-2	7-8	11	2	0	3	49
Steven Ashworth	Guard	32	3-10	2-7	17-17	7	7	0	0	25
Isaac Traudt	F	14	4-7	3-6	0-0	0	0	0	0	11
Jamiya Neal	Guard	36	3-7	0-2	0-1	2	6	0	0	6
Jasen Green	F	20	1-1	0-0	2-3	3	1	1	0	4
Ty Davis	G	18	1-2	0-1	0-0	5	2	0	0	2
Shane Thomas	G	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Mason Miller	F	28	0-3	0-3	0-0	7	1	0	0	0
Jackson McAndrew	F	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Fred King	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Josh Townley-Thomas	F	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.8Possessions76.8

112.0Offensive Efficiency128.9

128.9Defensive Efficiency112.0

-16.9Net Efficiency16.9

51.9%Effective FG%66.4%

52.6%True Shooting %72.0%

13.0%Turnover Rate19.5%

13.0%Free Throw Rate52.7%

45.5%3-Point Rate41.8%

1.30Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

Creighton won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 76.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.