Lipscomb logo

Lipscomb

18-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.2%Lipscomb
94.8%Arkansas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArkansas -18.4
PROJECTED TOTAL165.4
MODEL MONEYLINEArkansas -1823
Arkansas logo

Arkansas

28-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLipscomb 73
Projected Total165.4
Projected ScoreArkansas 92

Team Comparison

47.9MMH Power Index69.3
111.3Offensive Efficiency122.2
107.6Defensive Efficiency109.8
3.7Net Efficiency12.4
-2.5Strength of Schedule8.6
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.4
68.8Tempo73.8
54.8%Effective FG%56.4%
16.0%Turnover Rate12.2%
25.9%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
26.5%Free Throw Rate36.5%
2.5Average Margin9.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Arkansas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArkansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.3–47.9), offensive efficiency (122.2–111.3), net efficiency (12.4–3.7), strength of schedule (8.6–-2.5).
Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–109.8).
Final
Lipscomb logo
Lipscomb
60—76
Arkansas logo
Arkansas
Arkansas by 16 • 74.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATArkansas
22-58FG34-63
38.0%FG%54.0%
9-273PT4-19
33.0%3PT%21.0%
7-9FT4-7
78.0%FT%57.0%
29Rebounds35
5Offensive Rebounds6
8Assists10
19Turnovers12
8Steals11
1Blocks5
12Fouls11

Player Box Score

Lipscomb
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jacob OgnacevicF355-121-55-661000016
Gyasi PowellGuard325-122-60-121200012
Will PruittGuard324-123-61-180010012
Joe AndersonGuard332-52-50-05330006
Logan SuberG112-30-01-11020005
Grant AsmanF192-60-20-02110004
Charlie WilliamsC171-51-20-00200003
Rylan HouckForward81-20-00-02000002
Miles WhiteG130-10-10-00000000
Arkansas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Boogie FlandG367-181-82-233100017
Johnell DavisGuard367-121-40-061110015
Zvonimir IvisicC215-61-21-230130012
Adou ThieroForward204-60-10-24130008
D.J. WagnerG323-70-11-12210007
Trevon BrazileF223-50-00-08120006
Karter KnoxG112-41-30-02010005
Billy Richmond IIIG152-30-00-02211004
Jonas AidooForward71-20-00-03000002

Advanced Game Stats

74.3Possessions74.3
80.8Offensive Efficiency102.3
102.3Defensive Efficiency80.8
-21.5Net Efficiency21.5
45.7%Effective FG%57.1%
48.2%True Shooting %57.3%
24.9%Turnover Rate16.6%
15.5%Free Throw Rate11.1%
46.6%3-Point Rate30.2%
0.42Assist / Turnover0.83
Game Summary
Arkansas won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 74.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.