UC Irvine

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

29.2%UC Irvine

70.8%Belmont

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBelmont -6.1

PROJECTED TOTAL154.1

MODEL MONEYLINEBelmont -242

Belmont

26-6

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUC Irvine 74

Projected Total154.1

Projected ScoreBelmont 80

Team Comparison

UC IrvineMetricBelmont

58.4MMH Power Index61.8

106.9Offensive Efficiency118.6

95.0Defensive Efficiency103.7

11.9Net Efficiency14.9

-1.0Strength of Schedule-0.2

10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency10.0

72.3Tempo70.7

50.7%Effective FG%60.7%

17.6%Turnover Rate17.8%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %28.8%

36.5%Free Throw Rate32.7%

8.6Average Margin10.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Belmont HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBelmont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.8–58.4), offensive efficiency (118.6–106.9), net efficiency (14.9–11.9), strength of schedule (-0.2–-1.0).

UC Irvine COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (95.0–103.7), ball security (17.6–17.8), offensive rebounding (33.1–28.8).

Final

UC Irvine

92—84

Belmont

UC Irvine by 8 • 77.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UC IrvineTEAM STATBelmont

31-59FG32-69

53.0%FG%46.0%

6-193PT15-38

32.0%3PT%39.0%

24-26FT5-8

92.0%FT%63.0%

40Rebounds29

9Offensive Rebounds8

15Assists25

17Turnovers11

5Steals8

1Blocks3

13Fouls22

Player Box Score

UC Irvine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bent Leuchten	Center	28	6-9	0-1	11-12	15	2	0	0	23
Justin Hohn	Guard	31	6-12	4-6	3-4	3	4	1	0	19
Myles Che	G	32	7-13	0-3	4-4	4	2	0	0	18
Devin Tillis	F	31	5-7	0-1	5-5	8	2	0	1	15
Jurian Dixon	G	32	3-8	0-2	1-1	5	3	0	0	7
Torian Lee	G	13	2-4	2-4	0-0	0	0	2	0	6
Kyle Evans	F	10	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	2
Berk Can Akin	Guard	8	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Ofure Ujadughele	Guard	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Elijah Chol	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Ben Egbo	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Belmont

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Carter Whitt	Guard	31	9-14	4-6	3-4	5	9	1	0	25
Isaiah Walker	G	35	5-9	4-7	2-2	2	2	0	0	16
Tyler Lundblade	G	27	4-9	3-7	0-0	2	0	1	0	11
Drew Scharnowski	F	21	4-4	0-0	0-2	2	4	0	0	8
Jonathan Pierre	Forward	33	3-12	0-4	0-0	9	6	1	1	6
Sam Orme	F	24	2-10	2-9	0-0	4	2	3	1	6
Brody Peebles	Guard	15	2-6	2-5	0-0	1	1	2	0	6
Brigham Rogers	F	14	3-5	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	6

Advanced Game Stats

77.6Possessions77.6

118.6Offensive Efficiency108.2

108.2Defensive Efficiency118.6

10.3Net Efficiency-10.3

57.6%Effective FG%57.2%

64.5%True Shooting %57.7%

21.4%Turnover Rate14.5%

44.1%Free Throw Rate11.6%

32.2%3-Point Rate55.1%

0.88Assist / Turnover2.27

Game Summary

UC Irvine won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 77.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.