
Lipscomb
18-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.5%Lipscomb
73.5%Middle Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiddle Tennessee -6.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEMiddle Tennessee -277

Middle Tennessee
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLipscomb 72
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 79
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index52.5
111.3Offensive Efficiency109.6
107.6Defensive Efficiency105.7
3.7Net Efficiency3.9
-2.5Strength of Schedule0.4
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
68.8Tempo68.8
54.8%Effective FG%52.2%
16.0%Turnover Rate16.7%
25.9%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
26.5%Free Throw Rate33.2%
2.5Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Middle Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiddle Tennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.5–47.9), defensive efficiency (105.7–107.6), net efficiency (3.9–3.7), strength of schedule (0.4–-2.5).
Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.3–109.6), shooting efficiency (54.8–52.2), ball security (16.0–16.7).